Shooting in USA-thread. (21 Viewers)

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,773
I think the main problem here is an insane cultural paranoia perpetuated by irresponsible media coverage. Youve got white people being told dangerous minorities will break into your house at night and rape your family and other side being told that racist cops are actively hunting down and killing them. Both are rare incidents and no reason to be walking around ready to kill the first person who looks at you wrong.
I get what you're saying. But the media exists for conflict and fear. It sells papers. And they're only delivering what our amygdala has been pre-programmed to respond to. Despite keyboard cats.

You could call it irresponsible media coverage, but that's what we humans will tune in to.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
I get what you're saying. But the media exists for conflict and fear. It sells papers. And they're only delivering what our amygdala has been pre-programmed to respond to. Despite keyboard cats.

You could call it irresponsible media coverage, but that's what we humans will tune in to.
Isn't that just passing the buck? Since we know people respond to it a certain way, shouldn't we prevent the media for stimulating those fears?
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,773
Isn't that just passing the buck? Since we know people respond to it a certain way, shouldn't we prevent the media for stimulating those fears?
It is a cop out for the media. But to blame social attitudes on biases that have existed since we sat in animal skins and told gossip around a burning wildebeest is a red herring.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
It is a cop out for the media. But to blame social attitudes on biases that have existed since we sat in animal skins and told gossip around a burning wildebeest is a red herring.
I don't get your point. The media abuses something that we know is a part of us. So since they're not the cause we should give them a break (?) and do what exactly? Genetic engineering to rid ourselves of this instinct?

What's the pragmatic solution here. :p
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,337
this article here is worse than anything ive seen in american media of late \

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...shard-shrapnel-lodged-forehead-airstrike.html

Yeah, but that's the Daily Mail. If you go out and ask the British whether that newspaper is to be taken seriously, not even their own reads will say it should. Other than that we've obviously got a fair bit of fearmongering in our newspapers too. What we don't have is lobby groups that buy every single piece of publishing space to prevent, for example, gun control laws.

EDIT: just read the comments below the article, lots of criticism towards the Daily Mail.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,825
Yeah, but that's the Daily Mail. If you go out and ask the British whether that newspaper is to be taken seriously, not even their own reads will say it should. Other than that we've obviously got a fair bit of fearmongering in our newspapers too. What we don't have is lobby groups that buy every single piece of publishing space to prevent, for example, gun control laws.

EDIT: just read the comments below the article, lots of criticism towards the Daily Mail.
my point is this type of journalism is not exclusive to one nation

wait what?
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
This months hot topic thread. My quote inbox is off the charts I never see this kind of bandwidth :D
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,773
I don't get your point. The media abuses something that we know is a part of us. So since they're not the cause we should give them a break (?) and do what exactly? Genetic engineering to rid ourselves of this instinct?

What's the pragmatic solution here. :p
I wouldn't say the media abuses it. I would say they are conditioned by their audiences to deliver news that's driven by conflict and fear, because humans seek out and remember that stuff 10x more likely than they are to care about much encouraging news. We're wired for it.

The point wasn't to give the media a break... even though I am trying to make the point that the media is us and we're complicit in it. My point was to suggest that fear and scare tactics about crime and race aren't a new phenomenon that the media just made up. Grandmothers gossiped this garbage for generations before humanity knew what a knob was.

That also doesn't explain why the media are not doing this all over the world..
Not in countries where the government more closely controls the stories reported, for one.

this article here is worse than anything ive seen in american media of late \

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...shard-shrapnel-lodged-forehead-airstrike.html
British media is some of the best and worst at the same time.

ßöмßäяðîëя;5116770 said:
This would never happen in Belgium.


Finland, or Norway, perhaps, but not Belgium.
And definitely not in Claudio's bionic rectum.
 
OP
Fake Melo

Fake Melo

Ghost Division
Sep 3, 2010
37,077
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #380
    It's pretty obvious that if more students had been armed this wouldn't have happened.
    What I find funny is that many of the people arguing that more people should be armed are the same ones that also blame mental health every time it happens.

    So we have too many crazy people, let's arm them.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 20)