what if you need to see a specialist ??
that usually isnt covered in Canada, is it ??
Dental ??
You get better insurance coverage (Gold plan, or something like that) if your occupation offers that, correct ??
Our system isnt perfect, but I think its better
I would generally surmise that the specialist care is generally better in the States. But that's less than 2% of the population. Few of us fortunately experience the medical needs of what to do when there's a railroad spike rammed through your forehead and there are poisonous scorpions living in your anus.
That means for the greater than 98% of the cases of heath care, Americans pay for the most bloated, most expensive, and one of the least effective health care systems in the G-8 world. And I fully believe that. My opinion is based on, for example, what I know is the standard formulary regimen of health care for Type I diabetics in the U.S. versus that in Europe and Canada. It has only been in the past 2-3 years that the officially accepted regimen for California's largest private insurer met up to the standards that have been followed in the public health plans of most European countries for the past decade. In other words: when it comes to chronic or non-urgent care, American health care is largely a dinosaur.
And my opinion is based on working in prior hospital systems as a grad student where I observed that there are no incentives for financial efficiencies in advancing health care (something normally Americans pride themselves on having a lock on).
Americans could get so much more for their health care dollar if they could avoid the administrative bloat of multipayer systems, each with different forms, staff, and agencies. And if they could have more of a system that rewards financial efficiencies rather than creating new, expensive equipment, drugs and procedures that are relevant to only 1% of the population and yet the other 99% still have to be wastefully funded for it largely to over-prescribe and avoid lawsuits.
Instead of making the cost-effective MRI that could make it more accessible and financially viable to more patients who need it, instead we fund and funnel dollars to equipment and standards that are irrelevant except for the medical paper publishers and the handful of patients who can actually benefit from something on the fringes. This is the same financial logic that went behind $600 toilet seats in NASA: continually manufacture for only just a few instead of the masses, and the prices get ridiculous.
Vinman, the great irony is that the American health care system most closely resembles the most bloated, inefficient waste of government bureaucracies that are typically associated most with leftist, liberal political spending. It's a system where private industry has emulated (and exceeded) the worst habits and practices of "big government" evils.
Is it a surprise that one in six Americans has no health insurance? That's just messed up.