Well I personally think it suits his role perfectly. He doesn't give a shit about people, he's distanced from everything and it's only the case it matters, and it just suits him. IMO that role was nailed.
Exactly, even though i disregard the Robert Downey Jr. depiction of Holmes, it's much better than the TV series. Skinny pants, shirts, a fancy coat, androgynous and all in all a total pussy.
That's Bizzare, read enough Holmes books to know that despite the modern setting(alters the character of course for that) , the Sherlock tv series is MUCH more genuine depiction then those movies(his twisted nature) , Holmes isn't a classless action comedy hero...
That's Bizzare, read enough Holmes books to know that despite the modern setting(alters the character of course for that) , the Sherlock tv series is MUCH more genuine depiction then those movies(his twisted nature) , Holmes isn't a classless action comedy hero...
Visualy stunning movie, did not however have any clue of what the plot of the movie or book entailed. Had I known I think I would have steered well clear of this one, or perhaps have just viewed it with the volume down.
I guess I just wanted this movie to be about a guy surviving at sea with a tiger and nothing more.
It goes on tv for the last decade (re-runs all year long), prolly seen almost all episodes, way back. Its what defines Sherlock Holmes adaptions for me (since it was first one I saw, but also classic, almost literal adaption of character), but I still enjoy the modern take the Sherlock has ALOT, very entertaining. The movies? They are a joke, and I say this as someone who pretty much likes Downey Jr in anything he does (he is funny in his role, but he isnt Holmes).