Linux for your taste (sorry Naw :D) (23 Viewers)

What OS do you use?

  • Windows

  • Linux

  • Mac

  • Other


Results are only viewable after voting.

V

Senior Member
Jun 8, 2005
20,110
  • V

    V

@ gray; pass on rtorrent, trust me. :D
i've downloaded the latest utorrent and set it up in wine, runs as smooth as a baby's ass. ;)
 

gray

Senior Member
Moderator
Apr 22, 2003
30,260
Martin said:
Yeah, that's why I use azureus myself, it makes that stuff easy cause everyone has already seen those problems a million times and they've been fixed.
Grrr, I reinstalled Azureus and my torrents are running now... :irritated
vlatko said:
@ gray; pass on rtorrent, trust me. :D
i've downloaded the latest utorrent and set it up in wine, runs as smooth as a baby's ass. ;)
Hrmm I'll have to have a think about my torrent clients, but I must admit I have my reservations about running things in wine... I don't really know why; maybe because I fear it'll remind me of my Windows days :scared

EDIT: I forgot to mention my other two favourite messages:

1) Error: disk read error: NullPointerException
2) Waiting for other torrent(s) to Queue... just start downloading you mofo! Even Force Start doesn't kick some sense into it
3) Scrape error: BDecoder: zero length file

:mad:
 

gray

Senior Member
Moderator
Apr 22, 2003
30,260
Bah, I'm sick of doing triple-edits so I'll just double post...

Trying to update Amarok from 1.4.3 to 1.4.4, I used:

Code:
# apt-get update
# apt-get install amarok amarok-engines
I got:

Code:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
amarok is already the newest version.
amarok-engines is already the newest version.
Whyyy :sad:
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
gray said:
Bah, I'm sick of doing triple-edits so I'll just double post...

Trying to update Amarok from 1.4.3 to 1.4.4, I used:

Code:
# apt-get update
# apt-get install amarok amarok-engines
I got:

Code:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
amarok is already the newest version.
amarok-engines is already the newest version.
Whyyy :sad:
This is very simple. Ubuntu does not offer amarok 1.4.4 at the current time. You could add some repository that has more ahem experimental packages, but that could be broken. And in the long run, adding more repos I've noticed is somewhat risky to the overall integrity of the system.

What to do. Wait until they release it stable. Or looking for a bleeding edge kde/amarok repo.
 

V

Senior Member
Jun 8, 2005
20,110
  • V

    V

me too. perfectly pleased with 1.4.3 tbh.


gray said:
Hrmm I'll have to have a think about my torrent clients, but I must admit I have my reservations about running things in wine... I don't really know why; maybe because I fear it'll remind me of my Windows days :scared
yeah i'm not too crazy about it either but some windows apps are irreplaceable, to me at least. best examples are utorrent(best torrent manager by a mile, easy on the system too) and dvd shrink(no dvd back up solution works as well as this one, fast and simple as well). these 2 work perfectly well in wine and i'm using them.
 

gray

Senior Member
Moderator
Apr 22, 2003
30,260
vlatko said:
me too. perfectly pleased with 1.4.3 tbh.
Yeah I've got no gripes with 1.4.3 but it's always nice to feel up-to-date :D

vlatko said:
yeah i'm not too crazy about it either but some windows apps are irreplaceable, to me at least. best examples are utorrent(best torrent manager by a mile, easy on the system too) and dvd shrink(no dvd back up solution works as well as this one, fast and simple as well). these 2 work perfectly well in wine and i'm using them.
Ahh yes, I used those two programs exclusively for their respective purposes back in the day (and by that I mean last week, but I'm trying to distance myself from my dirty past AMAP), and Azureus is annoying me because it's the only program that seems to be able to download my torrents properly, but its way too fat for my liking (the only proggy I've encountered in Ubuntu that makes me wait :mad:)
 

V

Senior Member
Jun 8, 2005
20,110
  • V

    V

well if you change your mind, automatix sets up wine pretty well, just run winecfg afterwards, set up your drives and stuff. download the setup files, enter "wine setup_file" in the terminal and click on next like back in the old days. :)
 

V

Senior Member
Jun 8, 2005
20,110
  • V

    V

gray said:
my gosh, they even made the wine installer resemble windows? :disagree:
not resemble, it's the same installer only ran from linux. next> next> next> accept> next> next> next> finish. :D
 

Rami

The Linuxologist
Dec 24, 2004
8,065
vlatko said:
not resemble, it's the same installer only ran from linux. next> next> next> accept> next> next> next> finish. :D
You forgot the EULA Accept tick box;)


On another note, I have been running Amarok 1.4.4 for two days now, it's running smoothly thus far, no problems whatsoever. I installed moodbar and a couple of scripts also. TBH not much difference except for the magnatunes integration function, and I am not even using that....
 

gray

Senior Member
Moderator
Apr 22, 2003
30,260
And I enter my 3rd hour of trying to get my ATi card to work with Edgy... I'm getting damn sick of uninstalling and reinstalling drivers, getting stuck in the "can't load X" void and having to actually learn how to use the terminal (I guess that's one good thing I can take from this nightmare)

Apparently in Edgy (but not Dapper) you have to add an option to your xorg.conf to enable 3D, but that doesn't allow one to use XGL :mad:

Seriously, ATI and Linux just aren't very good friends are they?

EDIT: I'm about to reboot after uninstalling anything related to my gfx card and following the advice from about 50 different guides from scratch...

EDIT2: Hallelujah! It finally works :D The only problem now is that it's 4:45am and I should really sleep, but now that I've got it working I'll inevitably spend the next few hours setting up my eyecandy :D
 

gray

Senior Member
Moderator
Apr 22, 2003
30,260
Cheers vlatko, that'll definitely come in handy!

Man I just realised how much of a whole new dimension Compiz/Beryl/XGL is going to be, and I don't think I have the energy at this time of day to be able to set it all up, so I'll probably get some sleep and come back to it tomorrow.

I'd made it one of my main goals this week to get my gfx card working :geek: so I'm rather happy and looking forward to playing around with it now :D
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
gray said:
And I enter my 3rd hour of trying to get my ATi card to work with Edgy... I'm getting damn sick of uninstalling and reinstalling drivers, getting stuck in the "can't load X" void and having to actually learn how to use the terminal (I guess that's one good thing I can take from this nightmare)

Apparently in Edgy (but not Dapper) you have to add an option to your xorg.conf to enable 3D, but that doesn't allow one to use XGL :mad:

Seriously, ATI and Linux just aren't very good friends are they?

EDIT: I'm about to reboot after uninstalling anything related to my gfx card and following the advice from about 50 different guides from scratch...

EDIT2: Hallelujah! It finally works :D The only problem now is that it's 4:45am and I should really sleep, but now that I've got it working I'll inevitably spend the next few hours setting up my eyecandy :D
Let me say this. ATI's video driver is a piece of crap. Always have been, probably always will be.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 21)