Fabio Cannavaro (18 Viewers)

[JCK]

Just estimating. Hell, the number of board "haters" is probably even more than 50% of the forum, so I don't think your point makes any sense. The majority obviously want the return of this douchebag.

I would have estimated that the figures in the Cannavaro poll would have been reversed. Estimation is never a good way to be used as a statistic.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[only-juve]

Keep it that way, less words and more smilies from you is much better for this place.

and who gives a :faq1: about what you think or want. Its a JUVE forum for everyone to debate and argue as much as they want. So zip it jacky..

 

[JCK]

The problem at the moment is that one can only say that they do or do not want Cannavaro by looking at it very broadly, because we don't know enough about the terms of the contract or the Board's transfer strategy this summer.

As always, the devil is in the detail, so broad principles are all that one can reasonably speak about just now. Anything else is pure conjecture.

That is why I will not be voting until I know more details of the move.

A playground for the new Nostradamuses

 

[Bjerknes]

The problem at the moment is that one can only say that they do or do not want Cannavaro by looking at it very broadly, because we don't know enough about the terms of the contract or the Board's transfer strategy this summer.

As always, the devil is in the detail, so broad principles are all that one can reasonably speak about just now. Anything else is pure conjecture.

That is why I will not be voting until I know more details of the move.

I'm against this transfer no matter what the terms of the deal are. Even if Lippi and Pessotto and Ferrara was in charge of the transfer I'd still be against it on the grounds of Cannavaro sucking balls for the last three years, being too old to offer more than two years of service back there, and him already leaving us for whatever the hell reason he had after claiming he'd stick with the team through Serie B. In each and every argumentative point, the answer is NO!

We are supposedly to be building for the future, not reverting back to the same old players. These are steps in the wrong direction no matter how we look at it.

 

[JCK]

and who gives a :faq1: about what you think or want. Its a JUVE forum for everyone to debate and argue as much as they want. So zip it jacky..

You mentioned forum.

Isn't that where one expresses his or her opinion?

Well I just did, Einstein.

 

[Bjerknes]

I would have estimated that the figures in the Cannavaro poll would have been reversed. Estimation is never a good way to be used as a statistic.

Estimators play a huge role in statistics.

 

[Hust]

Ooooh, that says ALOT, in other words, you just want to generalize and belittle those who disagree with your point of view, what a suprise. I see the allure in it, its way easier then to actually argument for your point of view (I mean, someone writing their views logically like only juve did, we CANT have that, lets reply with some childish pic of a crying baby....).

I mean, there being valid reasons to be against this signing doesnt matter at all (and pretty much most who think so have specified those reasons already), they just do because they irrationally hate the board? Its neat and tidy conclusion, well done.

You can't really speak considering you belittled me the other day because I shared a different opinion than you. Hypocritical if you ask me.

 

[Red]

I'm against this transfer no matter what the terms of the deal are. Even if Lippi and Pessotto and Ferrara was in charge of the transfer I'd still be against it on the grounds of Cannavaro sucking balls for the last three years, being too old to offer more than two years of service back there, and him already leaving us for whatever the hell reason he had after claiming he'd stick with the team through Serie B. In each and every argumentative point, the answer is NO!

We are supposedly to be building for the future, not reverting back to the same old players. These are steps in the wrong direction no matter how we look at it.

That's fair enough.

If people just don't think Cannavaro has anything to offer it is perfectly reasonable to be against the transfer.

I think we could get one good year out of him and he could benefit the youngsters we have, but my being in favour is then subject to other details.

 

[JCK]

Estimators play a huge roll in statistics.

Then I estimate that there are less than 50% of this forum who are against the board and thus what I stated makes sense.

 

[Osman]

That's because I already presented my opinion, going on and on about it doesn't make it any more valid.

But claiming that if we sign Cannavaro it will be the only acquisition for the defence department is easy talk which I personally don't buy.

Firstly: What did you present other then childish petty generalization of those who disagree with your viewpoint and then repy with immature posts of cry baby pics to someone who ACTUALLY presented their opinion? You have zero interest in discussion, but just childishly sweeping to whatever convenient way you like, so dont pretend otherwise.



Secondly: It will be for the CB position, we will look for an RB if we can get rid of Zebina or Grygera, otherwise we are stuck with them (but most likely go for a RB like Zuniga or someone else, I would love it if we rob Roma for Motta). But CB will end with Canna signing and Criscito being brought back, thats Knezevics and Andrade's spots taken. What, you think we will get another CB? Then who will we sell to make space? Mellberg or Legro?


Its very easy to predict, Toro merda saying what he did isnt knowing more then the board, but KNOWING how the board does things. Just like we all speculated maybe someone else beside Mellberg will be signed when we signed him on a freebee few months before the summer. But as it turned out, we end our activity with the freebie. 2 seasons ago we had to sign someone, and we did with Andrade, but then too, our main reinforcements for the defense seemed to be freebies with Grygera, Sali, Molinaro to a degree, and then dragged Legro out from the chapel of forgotten has beens because he happend to have two functioning legs unlike our prime D signing, who shockingly enough, broke down in half (who cares he was injury plagued in a severe way 3 years in a row before signing for us...).

You are honestly telling me, you think Canna wont be our only CB signing? You think people know more then the board if they think it will be?

 

[Luca]

But we didn't know it would just be one year at the time the decision had to be taken.

At the point a lot of players were sold we were to start on -30 points, so it was probable that we would spend two years in 'B' and at least three years without the CL.

I think the problem was that we saw the -30 and sold aour players like they were on a programme of supermarket sweep, the fact of the matter is that we should have waited as the board should have very well known that we we bound to have the points cut, this is Italy after all, where the judicery is about as set in stone as jelly, (they closed down a building project near my home town because the neighbouring reigon got jealous because they didn't get the project)

 

[ESS-Juventino]

For of course with a apology from Him!

 

[Bjerknes]

Then I estimate that there are less than 50% of this forum who are against the board and thus what I stated makes sense.

Well, this is just petty stuff anyway.

I've stated my reasons as to why I don't want Cannavaro here, so I'm good.

 

[Osman]

And where did you get your statistics about how much are with and against the board on this forum?

And when did you analyzed that the minority who voted against signing Canna are those who are against the board? So non of those who are for Canna are against the board?

 

[Bjerknes]

You can look at one name on there to settle this entire petty argument.

Look which vote Vinni has chosen.

Case closed.

 

[Osman]

You can't really speak considering you belittled me the other day because I shared a different opinion than you. Hypocritical if you ask me.

Get over yourself, I and others explained to you how the clubs wont poach a player due to some legal loophole, and how its bad for the clubs who does it, but you still ignored that and harped on, so I called you naive, which you were coming off as.

 

[Hydde]

Secco sais we are spending big this summer----- ues i know he is clueless......
but if we are getting canna for fre... (which is a big gamble and maybe an step backwards as letsbrush pointed).... I dont see why the board cannot spend more money on defenders...

right now...the only big investment on the horizon is diego...... we have plenty of money to spend on defense as cannavaro is free.


This transfer campaign will definitely decide is this board and ranieri are capable and know what they are doing........or not

 

[Hust]

1.) Did anyone think we are not investing in a young CB when perhaps the idea is to groom Ariaudo or Criscito for that position? Looks like a potential Azzurri partnership in the making to me. Why spend millions on Kjaer or Agger when we could possibly have someone younger and/or better in the making?

2.) I think its a little bit too early to predict that the board has no clue who they will be signing this summer.

 

[Red]

I think the problem was that we saw the -30 and sold aour players like they were on a programme of supermarket sweep, the fact of the matter is that we should have waited as the board should have very well known that we we bound to have the points cut, this is Italy after all, where the judicery is about as set in stone as jelly, (they closed down a building project near my home town because the neighbouring reigon got jealous because they didn't get the project)

It was difficult, which is why I have always refrained from criticizing the Board for what they did that summer.

 

[JCK]

Firstly: What did you present other then childish petty generalization of those who disagree with your viewpoint and then repy with immature posts of cry baby pics to someone who ACTUALLY presented their opinion? You have zero interest in discussion, but just childishly sweeping to whatever convenient way you like, so dont pretend otherwise.



Secondly: It will be for the CB position, we will look for an RB if we can get rid of Zebina or Grygera, otherwise we are stuck with them (but most likely go for a RB like Zuniga or someone else, I would love it if we rob Roma for Motta). But CB will end with Canna signing and Criscito being brought back, thats Knezevics and Andrade's spots taken. What, you think we will get another CB? Then who will we sell to make space? Mellberg or Legro?


Its very easy to predict, Toro merda saying what he did isnt knowing more then the board, but KNOWING how the board does things. Just like we all speculated maybe someone else beside Mellberg will be signed when we signed him on a freebee few months before the summer. But as it turned out, we end our activity with the freebie. 2 seasons ago we had to sign someone, and we did with Andrade, but then too, our main reinforcements for the defense seemed to be freebies with Grygera, Sali, Molinaro to a degree, and then dragged Legro out from the chapel of forgotten has beens because he happend to have two functioning legs unlike our prime D signing, who shockingly enough, broke down in half (who cares he was injury plagued in a severe way 3 years in a row before signing for us...).

You are honestly telling me, you think Canna wont be our only CB signing? You think people know more then the board if they think it will be?

Go read the first two pages of this thread and you'll see my point of view.