Fabio Cannavaro (23 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

only-juve

Senior Member
Jan 5, 2008
7,451
Only because of hate towards the management and the coach. Most of those people you are wondering about will oppose any other move done by the current Juve board. It's crystal clear it's just because of that.
No one will be against a Diego, silva, Ribery kind of players if they ever came here. The Key word here is "QUALITY" thats why most of us bitching over these moves from the management. Get us a World class defender or a midfielder and you would hear no one saying anything against the board.

QUALITY is what we just hope for nothing more, is that too much !!!
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,382
:agree:

You know, about Cannavaro, i really wouldn't mind him if i know for sure that we bought Diego, full back(s) and we were left pennyless. If i know that the choice is Canna or no-one, or Canna or Knezevic, i wouldn't mind him.

But i get the impression that we're first signing Canna and only later we'll start thinking about the rest. This i don't like at all. I hate it actually. It gives me the impression that our directors don't have a good plan, or in other words, they are clueless
.
What has the order of signings to do with anything if all the positions to be acquired are already planned? The opportunity knocked to signing Cannavaro for free, if it is left to later we might lose out on him, I don't see any signs of cluelessness in that.

How much did we get from Cannavaro's sale to Real?
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,382
No one will be against a Diego, silva, Ribery kind of players if they ever came here. The Key word here is "QUALITY" thats why most of us bitching over these moves from the management. Get us a World class defender or a midfielder and you would hear no one saying anything against the board.

QUALITY is what we just hope for nothing more, is that too much !!!
 
OP
Dostoevsky

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,989
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #524
    :agree:

    You know, about Cannavaro, i really wouldn't mind him if i know for sure that we bought Diego, full back(s) and we were left pennyless. If i know that the choice is Canna or no-one, or Canna or Knezevic, i wouldn't mind him.

    But i get the impression that we're first signing Canna and only later we'll start thinking about the rest. This i don't like at all. I hate it actually. It gives me the impression that our directors don't have a good plan, or in other words, they are clueless.
    Well if that's the case they are not idiots but biggest morons out there.Still, I want to believe that they are not that stupid and that they know what they're doing with this transfer.In other words, I hope that they already have planned how to spend ~40mln euros and it's only Cannavaro or no one for central back spot.

    But if we do something wrong in this transfer market with this move as you already mentioned our directors should do harikiri.
     

    Osman

    Koul Khara!
    Aug 30, 2002
    61,493
    :agree:

    You know, about Cannavaro, i really wouldn't mind him if i know for sure that we bought Diego, full back(s) and we were left pennyless. If i know that the choice is Canna or no-one, or Canna or Knezevic, i wouldn't mind him.

    But i get the impression that we're first signing Canna and only later we'll start thinking about the rest. This i don't like at all. I hate it actually. It gives me the impression that our directors don't have a good plan, or in other words, they are clueless.
    This is exactly why I am against this, if I thought we were getting the other quality players we need, I wouldnt mind this, but just re-check their modus operandi, sign a freebie, invest as little as possible, and just hope things will fix themselves. Thats more or less with their defensive investments mainly. I mean, just look at our squad, and who they have signed for the defence and midfield (barr Momo), and tell me you really think things will be so different this summer. Signing Canna is NOT a good sign for things to come, the opposite IMO.
     

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    125,382
    Bullshit, Canna is my fav defender, and we still held that level, I would welcome over anyone else, but I watch Real almost weekly, and he is NOT GOOD, I see him in the NT couple of games a year, and he is NOT GOOD. Experience can only carry you so much, he has lost alot, him playing in Italy with more tactical safety will make him look better, but he is still lacking quite a bit individually. And this defence needs certified quality player that we can rely on for years to come, but after years of signing average players, we now sign a 36 year old? And you say the only reason anyone would have against this because one is biased against the board?

    Far from it, if they signed quality players in the other positions, i wouldnt mind having Canna around at all, but I know how this board operate, they will try to sell us that Canna alone is the change we need, and not care for much other upgrade, just stick an aged former great 36 year older amongst a cast of average players and hope things fix themselves. This is the 3rd year under them, slow rebuilding process time is over, its time we really bring quality players to this team (and we arent penniless, they can invest if they prioritize the issue), and there is some upside to getting Cannavaro, a legendary defender, but the main thing is he is past it and is 36 year old, and this club wont bother to fix our problems much other then getting him most likely. And I dont know why its being so easily accepted.
    You don't fall among the group I mentioned. Spare me explanations.
     

    Osman

    Koul Khara!
    Aug 30, 2002
    61,493
    Then who does? have listen to the reasons for those who disagree, and I dont see any foundation for that petty generalization of yours. Prolly alot of those who are usually against the board voted in favour for Canna in this poll.
     

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    125,382
    Although no fee was confirmed by either club, press speculation has often set the combined transfer's worth at roughly 20 million euros.
    So we sell him for 20 Million € and get him back for free? With a huge wage cut?

    I am trying so hard to see what is wrong in that but it's not working. I guess I don't know as much as some others who know exactly what the management has been doing ever since the Deschamps incident up until now. They also know their personal plans and agenda. Some people here really know too much it's scary.
     

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    125,382
    Then who does? have listen to the reasons for those who disagree, and I dont see any foundation for that petty generalization of yours. Prolly alot of those who are usually against the board voted in favour for Canna in this poll.
    Those who oppose the board's decisions no matter what know themselves.
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    53,930
    What has the order of signings to do with anything if all the positions to be acquired are already planned? The opportunity knocked to signing Cannavaro for free, if it is left to later we might lose out on him, I don't see any signs of cluelessness in that.

    How much did we get from Cannavaro's sale to Real?
    The transfer market holds many surprises. You could never know if a better defender will be available in July or August, and we might miss out on him because we won't have anymore money left.
    Cannavaro is a player that we can allow losing out on.

    But ignore that, what i fear is that the positions to be acquired aren't planned. Maybe they are and i'm 100% wrong, but i fear they aren't. Probably Diego is planned, but for the defense we might be a little more clueless and this opportunity with Cannavaro will force us to invest in a full back and ignore the CB position. Just like if we could get a full back on free we were going to invest more in a CB.

    This isn't so bad after all, but it will mean that our directors didn't have a plan and the circumstances in the mercato were creating their plan.

    P.S: Cannavaro and Emerson were sold in a package deal for 20m eur if i'm not wrong.
     

    Luca

    Senior Member
    Apr 22, 2007
    12,750
    The transfer market holds many surprises. You could never know if a better defender will be available in July or August, and we might miss out on him because we won't have anymore money left.
    Cannavaro is a player that we can allow losing out on.

    But ignore that, what i fear is that the positions to be acquired aren't planned. Maybe they are and i'm 100% wrong, but i fear they aren't. Probably Diego is planned, but for the defense we might be a little more clueless and this opportunity with Cannavaro will force us to invest in a full back and ignore the CB position. Just like if we could get a full back on free we were going to invest more in a CB.

    This isn't so bad after all, but it will mean that our directors didn't have a plan and the circumstances in the mercato were creating their plan.

    P.S: Cannavaro and Emerson were sold in a package deal for 20m eur if i'm not wrong.
    Yes i'm sure that is the case, pretty much like zambro and thuram.
    One thing which always gets me is why didn't we loan some of these players so we could bring them back when we returned to Siere A? I know we were in a powerless position, but we could have at least tried to pursuade players to go away then come back.
     

    Osman

    Koul Khara!
    Aug 30, 2002
    61,493
    So we sell him for 20 Million € and get him back for free? With a huge wage cut?

    I am trying so hard to see what is wrong in that but it's not working. I guess I don't know as much as some others who know exactly what the management has been doing ever since the Deschamps incident up until now. They also know their personal plans and agenda. Some people here really know too much it's scary.
    20m for both him and Emerson, prolly quite even in the valuation of the two (Emerson is Capello's favourite pet), unlike Thuram and Zambro which most of the joint fee was for Zambro, and Thuram was just a bonus.


    Cannavaro costs nothing now because he is 36 and past it. This no bargain at all.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 23)