++ [ originally posted by grecul ] ++
but they DID win in the end didnt they?
and a very very anxius win wasn t it?
i just had to answer the question, why.
and in case u dont get yet: its fear.
why to play on life and death when u can arrange smth?
if i was a about t o fix it i would exactly this scenario:denmark sould score first and sweden who has more abilities will follow,
2 goals every half time
and the last on the end for no reaction time, but a little earlier than 90' in case the ball wont enter that easy.
its like waching a horror film and u already know the end
but they DID win in the end didnt they?
and a very very anxius win wasn t it?
i just had to answer the question, why.
and in case u dont get yet: its fear.
why to play on life and death when u can arrange smth?
if i was a about t o fix it i would exactly this scenario:denmark sould score first and sweden who has more abilities will follow,
2 goals every half time
and the last on the end for no reaction time, but a little earlier than 90' in case the ball wont enter that easy.
its like waching a horror film and u already know the end
It isn't quite that easy to fix a match, these people aren't puppets. Maybe I'll buy that occasionally a ref has it in for one team or the other, or something like that. But I watched this match, it clearly wasn't fixed.
I might buy it if Sweden had the lead and allowed Denmark to equalize because they still would have won the group. But as it happened, the result penalized Denmark too much for them to have simply encouraged it to happen,
Buy on AliExpress.com