Why do you always digress? The point of the analogy is that you can't write something off in such a generalizing fashion as you have just because something doesn't agree with you. You probably dislike American football or don't care for it but there's a good chance you would have been obsessed with it if you grew up in the US.
I'm playing your tune here because you're psychologically analyzing why people chose to believe when it's not that simple and frankly makes you look like really ignorant.
Even though you think there's a good chance I'd be obsessed with it, I'd probably end up hating it or not caring about it. From what I know, American football is equivalent to cricket here, and if I'm exposed to Ame. football as much as I was exposed to cricket here, I'd end up hating it. And if I was born in Italy, I'd probably hate football too. Just so you know.
Fine, perhaps I shouldn't have generalized it. But take them as the reasons I've found to be true about religion so far. You certainly cannot discount them, because for certain people, it is true.
If you really think I am ignorant, then show me what I'm ignoring so I can correct my views. Simply calling me ignorant and leaving it there doesn't help.
We are taught many things as children both by our parents and the society but do we possess them all in our entire lives? It's not an isolated place we are living in, we sure affect the environment and we are affected by it but do we all end up living identical lives, having identical ways of thinking?
Well of course we don't. But what reason do these people have to actually continue believing in it, when what is being asked by them(faith) is pretty much the opposite of our main system of belief(evidence and reasoning)?