Your opinion on new transfers (5 Viewers)
- Thread starter JCK
- Start date
I have mixed feelings about our transfers.. Providing we buy Veloso/Alonso it's reasonable to say we've been successful but i can't give our management anything more than a pass because they once again have failed to see the bleedingly obvious in that our defense is clearly the week spot of our team and bringing in another 2 decent defenders to compete with the likes of Legro & Grygera is not really that smart.. I still think we should have been focusing on starting defenders who don't make us scared before every game and which would thus give more balance to our midfield as our defense wouldnt need as much help.. They're really weren't too many excuses either, we can't say that we lacked the money because we bought a 22 million dollar attacker to what already was the premium foward line in Italy
You're from Zimbabwe? You have my deepest sympathies 
And for the thread, De Ceglie is technically a signing because we bought his half back, while Giovinco and Marchisio are just Juve players being brought back. For our signings, I think Amauri will be extremely good with us. De Ceglie is a nice youngster to have and hopefully breakthrough. And Mellberg good defender to have, even we could have done better.
The clincher will be when we get Alonso this week. Will doubt many will vote negatively then.
And for the thread, De Ceglie is technically a signing because we bought his half back, while Giovinco and Marchisio are just Juve players being brought back. For our signings, I think Amauri will be extremely good with us. De Ceglie is a nice youngster to have and hopefully breakthrough. And Mellberg good defender to have, even we could have done better.
The clincher will be when we get Alonso this week. Will doubt many will vote negatively then.
Who are you with these percentages, Tuttosport?
What do they even mean? You give Mellberg a supposed 65 but then give Knezevic a 60. Does that mean Mellberg is only 5 points better than Knezevic, or do you mean that Mellberg and Knezevic are the same and only what separates their scores is 5 points for a free transfer?
Then you have Alonso as a 75 and De Ceglie and Marchisio as an 80? Does that mean the latter two are both better than Alonso, or did you combine their scores so they're both worth only 40? And what is so special with their arrival... they were already on our books.
And for the last time, it's MarchisIo, not Marchiso.
What do they even mean? You give Mellberg a supposed 65 but then give Knezevic a 60. Does that mean Mellberg is only 5 points better than Knezevic, or do you mean that Mellberg and Knezevic are the same and only what separates their scores is 5 points for a free transfer?
Then you have Alonso as a 75 and De Ceglie and Marchisio as an 80? Does that mean the latter two are both better than Alonso, or did you combine their scores so they're both worth only 40? And what is so special with their arrival... they were already on our books.
And for the last time, it's MarchisIo, not Marchiso.
alonso 75?!That's just some of the weirdest thinking I've ever heard of. It would be more useful being skeptical of talents instead of overrating someone just because all you know about him is what goal.com says, but instead we have clowns who believe everything they read in the media, or just don't have any brains at all. This guy would fit in here in the states, waiving his flag and listening to Fix News.
