I can't remember anyone saying we don't need Van Persie.
read back van persie thread
everyone was pretty sure we didn't need van Persie
- - - Updated - - -
no but many were under the impression he would fail in italy
Yes cos they overrate Serie A.
if you can score as mad in England you can easily score in Italy were football is much slower and psychical
- - - Updated - - -
The major concern I had about Van Persie was if he could manage another season or two not injured...so far he has been fine, but on 12 million a year, every time he tripped over something, everyone would be shitting themselves
Injury phrone he was but when was the last time he was seriously injured. and that in a harder (psychical and more games) league.
we all fap on pirlo (who was injury phrone also). I knew we would never get him. But van Persie would be a dream signing for this current juve.
- - - Updated - - -
شيزيو;3919862 said:
Van persie on one leg better than all our strikers combined on steroids.
- - - Updated - - -
And 100 million more expensive as well
van persie 25m
for three years of salary of 10m a season
total 55m
Quag 11 m and 2 m a season for 5 year contract = 21m
matri 18m and 2 m a season for 4 year contract = 26m
bendtner and borrielo loan + salary for the time being here 3m
giovinco 11m for his half (sold for 3m) so 8. 2m a season for 4 year contract = 16m
vucinic 15m and 3m a season for 5 year = 30m
total
21 + 26 + 3 + 16 + 30 = 96 m
maybe not perfect but for sure we spend around 80 m on striker we have now
and we could had got quag and van persie for the same money
