[SPA] La Liga 2009/2010 (32 Viewers)
- Thread starter Azzurri7
- Start date
Fred made so many wrong ASSUMPTIONS that I proved to be wrong.
If he wins this then in Drogba style I say that this is a FUCKING DISGRACE!!
Anyway, the starting point of the discussion was Fred saying that Drogba doesn't belong to the list consisted of Torres, Villa and Zlatan while I though he does.
Actually, many think he does judging by their posts.
I didn't claim Drogba to be better, I claimed that he's at the same level as the other 3 mentioned players. Fred downplayed Drogba's quality and importance by naming every other opinion Bullshit and asking: "what has Drogba really done to put himself among these strikers. I mean why do people overrate him so much?"
I won!
If he wins this then in Drogba style I say that this is a FUCKING DISGRACE!!
Anyway, the starting point of the discussion was Fred saying that Drogba doesn't belong to the list consisted of Torres, Villa and Zlatan while I though he does.
Actually, many think he does judging by their posts.
I didn't claim Drogba to be better, I claimed that he's at the same level as the other 3 mentioned players. Fred downplayed Drogba's quality and importance by naming every other opinion Bullshit and asking: "what has Drogba really done to put himself among these strikers. I mean why do people overrate him so much?"
I won!
This debate is nothing compared to the Clichy and Hamsik debates between me and Alen. Those took pages and pages 
Your argument was that Clichy is the best LB in the world, then you changed it and said that he's surely one of the best 3.
Sooner or later you'll admit that he's nowhere near the top.
And you'll lose in Hamsik's debate too.
It's just my experience that's beating you for now. In some 5-6 years i'll stand no chance against you.
Not really. All you really had was stats, stats could be used to support any argument. I don't bother looking up stats, instead i gave you a season by season analysis. I also argued that Drogba isn't as consistent as Torres is. I showed you how in two of his seasons he didn't reach double digits in the league.
Most of the people who follow the EPL would agree with me. Actually all of them did other than Red perhaps. There must be a reason for that.
Most of the people who follow the EPL would agree with me. Actually all of them did other than Red perhaps. There must be a reason for that.
And on both I'll win.
Your argument was that Clichy is the best LB in the world, then you changed it and said that he's surely one of the best 3.
Sooner or later you'll admit that he's nowhere near the top.
And you'll lose in Hamsik's debate too.
It's just my experience that's beating you for now. In some 5-6 years i'll stand no chance against you.
Your argument was that Clichy is the best LB in the world, then you changed it and said that he's surely one of the best 3.
Sooner or later you'll admit that he's nowhere near the top.
And you'll lose in Hamsik's debate too.
It's just my experience that's beating you for now. In some 5-6 years i'll stand no chance against you.
I did say he was in the top 3 for two seasons. Which were the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008. I even admitted he was poor last season, although admittedly i wrongly predicted that he will be back to his best this season. But he has been just as average as last season thus far.
Hamsik debate is still ongoing.
You're experience and you digging up stats from the ground is a really tiring thing. I doubt you'd lose that in 5-6 years
