Should Beppe Marotta be sacked? (3 Viewers)

[swag]

So why hasn't Moratta been executed yet by a firing squad?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Nzoric]

So why hasn't Moratta been executed yet by a firing squad?

He just can't close in on the contract. We should know more by monday.

 

[Trequartista]

So why hasn't Moratta been executed yet by a firing squad?

He loaned the firing squad with an option to buy.

 

[Hust]

Stopped reading after that.

...

Doing well

Stopped there...found it contradictory.

 

[Nzoric]

He loaned the firing squad with an option to buy.

They'll probably miss since Marotta can't buy quality.

 

[Trequartista]

Indeed.

 

[sallyinzaghi]

It has to be a complementary relationship and I don't understand why it has to be an either/or thing when it comes to marrotta and conte in this stupid thread. and how do you judge what a 'good purchase' is, by their name? popularity? price? in the end it comes down to the performance and squad fit, which of course conte played a big role in, but marotta too acquired the players that are suitable, that fit. if barza and bonucci leaked 50+ goals plus then, and are now italy's best defense, no doubt it is contributed to conte's work, but would you say marotta was a bad director in acquiring them in the first place? no. so what is the problem? rome wasn't built in a day hell I think we all know that after calciopoli. to get to where we are now, and saying marotta had zero role in it, is simply ludicrous

 

[Hust]

They'll probably miss since Marotta can't buy quality.

He probably bought the guns on clearance, so the guns themselves will miss because they misfired.

 

[Nzoric]

He probably bought the guns on clearance, so the guns themselves will miss because they misfired.

 

[Enron]

He loaned the firing squad with an option to buy.

I thought it was a co-own to Parma?

 

[Hust]

Truth hurts.

He can't even get killed he sucks so badly.

 

[Deep C]

ground floor

 

[Trequartista]

I thought it was a co-own to Parma?

Loan with option to co-own.

 

[.zero]

Time to troll :rubshandstogether:

 

[Hust]

Time to troll :rubshandstogether:

:goodgood:

 

[.zero]

It has to be a complementary relationship and I don't understand why it has to be an either/or thing when it comes to marrotta and conte in this stupid thread. and how do you judge what a 'good purchase' is, by their name? popularity? price? in the end it comes down to the performance and squad fit, which of course conte played a big role in, but marotta too acquired the players that are suitable, that fit. if barza and bonucci leaked 50+ goals plus then, and are now italy's best defense, no doubt it is contributed to conte's work, but would you say marotta was a bad director in acquiring them in the first place? no. so what is the problem? rome wasn't built in a day hell I think we all know that after calciopoli. to get to where we are now, and saying marotta had zero role in it, is simply ludicrous

Marotta had less than zero role in the club's success.

Imaginary numbers come to mind.

 

[Hust]

Marotta had less than zero role in the club's success.

Imaginary numbers come to mind.

I like this point, actually.

Really highlights the creativity of the imagination behind posts like this.

 

[.zero]

I like this point, actually.

Really highlights the creativity of the imagination behind posts like this.

There's plenty more from where that came from.

Stay tuned sugar tits

 

[Hust]

There's plenty more from where that came from.

Stay tuned sugar tits

Still tuned...and waiting.

Never keep a lady waiting, Dru.

 

[swag]

So are we going to put his head on a pike or what?

This thread sure ain't going anywhere...