Should Beppe Marotta be sacked? (2 Viewers)

Should Marotta be sacked?

  • Yes - his signings are an embarrassment to the club

  • No - he just got us to the Scudetto and we should see where that takes us

  • WTF - When did we suddenly inherit aching ladyparts like interisti?


Results are only viewable after voting.

napoleonic

Senior Member
Sep 7, 2010
4,129
I'm sorry but how is performance is irrelivant to transfer director?
me said:
barzagli? bonucci? the same 2 men that leaked 50+ goals at the season when we bought them and played under del neri...
so how did the same barzagli-bonucci-chiellini trio that leaked 50+ goals under del neri became quite invincible under conte? did marrotta do something about them? what?

melo - tiago - marchisio - diego midfield wasn't so otherworldly bad compared to MVP, certainly not to the degree of difference that the result shown statistically (7th finish vs unbeaten champion).

so how do performances relevant THAT MUCH to the transfer director?

maybe some of you just also not that objective again toward cronios' posts... :D
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
A team is not made of star names it's made of the whole squad, and I'm too lazy to get the names but I think you would find that our squad was a joke compared to the current, the subs even reserves...

And Melo - tiuago - marchisio - diago is in no way comparable to MVP, the later is a lot of levels above.

I'm not saying that the results are all down to Marotta, but to say it's Conte 95% and Marotta 5% or even less is pure bs.
 

napoleonic

Senior Member
Sep 7, 2010
4,129
And Melo - tiuago - marchisio - diago is in no way comparable to MVP, the later is a lot of levels above.
a lot of levels above? that is a very biased assessment... diego to this day have won more trophies on europe than vidal, then melo was kinda like vidal at that time, the difference is just psychological, then we had the same marchisio... and then we had tiago that used to be good and have won somethings too on other leagues...

how is that so a lot of levels below current MVP? based on what? you are sounding as if the midfield we had in 2010 was filled with nocerinos or pescara players or other such level players when in reality they were quite big names on their day.

they were so badly underperformed, that is clear, but they certainly were not a bunch of nobodies.
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
Wel Diego had potential and I wanted him to stay, tiago was such a flot it wasn't even funny. Melo had good games but most of the time was a liability, and marchisio was nowehre near the level he is now.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,969
I did answer though... a finisher and competence on his work!

If i say a Palacio, you will just find an excuse, if i name many (Guarin,Pereira, Vargas, Destro, etc etc), you will focus on the details of the weakest link and turn away the bulk argumentation to semantics, so GK Alen, i need to rest, i made my point and history will decide sometime if i was right or wrong...
Why do you think that Inter did a better deal for Palacio than we did for Isla? They got a 30 year old SS who's never gonna be preferred to Cassano and Milito. We got a 24 year old RWB who, EVEN if he's just a depth player as you think, was one of the very best in the world in his position. On top of it, Isla was their first choice to replace Maicon and we "stole" him from them by offering more money. Isla is too superior to the others you mentioned (none of them really made his team better, btw) so I won't compare him to these "top purchases".

Marotta can be criticized for only one thing this summer: failure to get a top striker. The failure wasn't influenced by the lack of money or the fact that he splashed a fortune on squad players. The bare confirmation from Fiorentina and Jovetic that we made a big bid which Viola decided to reject, proves that we did have money, but we failed to get a top striker.
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
a lot of levels above? that is a very biased assessment... diego to this day have won more trophies on europe than vidal, then melo was kinda like vidal at that time, the difference is just psychological, then we had the same marchisio... and then we had tiago that used to be good and have won somethings too on other leagues...

how is that so a lot of levels below current MVP? based on what? you are sounding as if the midfield we had in 2010 was filled with nocerinos or pescara players or other such level players when in reality they were quite big names on their day.

they were so badly underperformed, that is clear, but they certainly were not a bunch of nobodies.
Based on performance. Please, never hesitate to base it on performance.

Diego is perhaps the one that was put in an unfair position, but I don't think he's ever come close to what we have now.
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
so thierry henry was a serie b class forward then, he was worse than borriello... borriello scored 2 goals in 10 match while henry scored 3 in 16 for us... ;) how about that?
Yeah and tiago melo and diego are one of the best midfields of their generation now. You win, argument flawless.
 

The Arif

Senior Member
Jan 31, 2004
12,564
a lot of levels above? that is a very biased assessment... diego to this day have won more trophies on europe than vidal, then melo was kinda like vidal at that time, the difference is just psychological, then we had the same marchisio... and then we had tiago that used to be good and have won somethings too on other leagues...

how is that so a lot of levels below current MVP? based on what? you are sounding as if the midfield we had in 2010 was filled with nocerinos or pescara players or other such level players when in reality they were quite big names on their day.

they were so badly underperformed, that is clear, but they certainly were not a bunch of nobodies.
How is the bolded part a relevant argument? Did Diego single-handedly win his team trophies? Pepe Reina has more titles won than Buffon, does that mean he's better than Buffon? And the players we had before MVP weren't totally unknown, but they weren't exactly world beaters either. MVP is definetely a lot of levels above the midfield we has under Secco.
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
so thierry henry was a serie b class forward then, he was worse than borriello... borriello scored 2 goals in 10 match while henry scored 3 in 16 for us... ;) how about that?
If you're failing to understand why MVP is significantly better than the midfielders we had before, then I'm afraid I can't help you.

It's funny that you make that argument but you don't really know what you're talking about.
 
Jan 5, 2011
1,978
I came to this thread hoping to get entertainment from some members posts (cough Cronios cough). I did have entertainment.

Ps: but seriously this thread was created just for fun debate right. I will be surprise if Marotta is sacked cause he did a pretty good job so far.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
That's because Milan are financially broke, you can't seriously compare Galiani ATM with Marotta (leaving aside our hate to Milan).

We were atleast among the top 5 spenders in Europe for the past years (Milan hardly even make top 10 on that list) plus they've just sold their best 2 players by far without replacing them.

Personally I think it's fair to compare our squad with a club that relatively spends close to us, that way we can really compare the two directors.
i agree

we drawn at the cl holders home turf, and we had an unbeaten season

what team with simular expenses such as ourselves can say this



and about the expenses, dont forget we had to completely rehaul a team. most teams that spend around what we did, just needed a player or two, were we needed an entire new team
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)