I’m pretty sure the next move will be to ban it nationally, which will become reality in a GOP trifecta possibly as soon as 2024. So you can easily move then.
Buy on AliExpress.com
'Murica! (374 Viewers)
- Thread starter Fake Melo
- Start date
- Tags afl_italia's cousins forza trump smocking gun
Buy on AliExpress.com
But the supposed incoming red wave in 2022 is not ideological Republicans its just reactionary frustration about the Dem's failure to pass anything they campaign on despite having control of the federal govt.
I would think going after abortion and potentially contraception is political suicide for Republicans. It would send those so called "barstool Republicans" back to the left.
I would think going after abortion and potentially contraception is political suicide for Republicans. It would send those so called "barstool Republicans" back to the left.
Last edited:
That's a very wild claim there buddy:
-The total number of abortions after 20 weeks’ gestation are 11,500 per year. (Johnston Archive)
-George Tiller, who was assassinated for performing third trimester abortions, once stated that only 800 fetal anomalies were discovered out of 10,000 patients, or 8% of total cases.
-The total number of abortions after 20 weeks’ gestation are 11,500 per year. (Johnston Archive)
-George Tiller, who was assassinated for performing third trimester abortions, once stated that only 800 fetal anomalies were discovered out of 10,000 patients, or 8% of total cases.
Oh gimme a break 
Now not having had an abortion myself in a while, I'm not even sure how that data gets collected. My next question would have been: Is everyone who gets an abortion in the third tri subject to a required reasoning test? Because if it's not, and if you can still get an abortion without answering the question, that's faulty construction.
Lol what, it's like tuz adding a year to players age, 2*12=24, there's no specific data from CDC on 24 weeks so i presented you data they have which is post 21 weeks, close enough. Feel free to pick a number of doctor assisted homicides you can live with and that falls within your silly premise of "it doesn't happen, ever."
Not trying to troll you. You have to understand that you could say I pull apart poor hypotheses from faulty data for a living these days. So I'm gonna have questions.
Now not having had an abortion myself in a while, I'm not even sure how that data gets collected. My next question would have been: Is everyone who gets an abortion in the third tri subject to a required reasoning test? Because if it's not, and if you can still get an abortion without answering the question, that's faulty construction.
Now not having had an abortion myself in a while, I'm not even sure how that data gets collected. My next question would have been: Is everyone who gets an abortion in the third tri subject to a required reasoning test? Because if it's not, and if you can still get an abortion without answering the question, that's faulty construction.
You would not consider this justified?
https://storycorps.org/stories/reme...urder-a-couple-reflects-on-his-abortion-care/
https://storycorps.org/stories/reme...urder-a-couple-reflects-on-his-abortion-care/
politics is a tug of war for those swing voters in the middle no? The evangelical base will never vote blue ever.
Justices on the supreme court might be actually, genuinely ideologically opposed to abortion but will the wider GOP see going after abortion nationally as actually advantageous to them long term? Will their corporate masters see it that way?
Solely because of how incompetent and corrupt establishment Dems show themselves to be every single day, it seems like the GOP has been handed an unexpected lifeline from the old "demographics is destiny" theory that a reducing white population would prevent them from ever winning national elections again. In my mind going after abortion rights nationally is going to sever that lifeline. America is just not a pro-life country.
Anyway if the Republicans want to reduce the number of abortions in the country then why not expand publicly funded family planning services and contraception for low income areas. That would reduce the need for abortions and probably save money long term because many children that would grow up on the government dollar or potentially accumulate public costs through the criminal justice system would never be born.
Justices on the supreme court might be actually, genuinely ideologically opposed to abortion but will the wider GOP see going after abortion nationally as actually advantageous to them long term? Will their corporate masters see it that way?
Solely because of how incompetent and corrupt establishment Dems show themselves to be every single day, it seems like the GOP has been handed an unexpected lifeline from the old "demographics is destiny" theory that a reducing white population would prevent them from ever winning national elections again. In my mind going after abortion rights nationally is going to sever that lifeline. America is just not a pro-life country.
Anyway if the Republicans want to reduce the number of abortions in the country then why not expand publicly funded family planning services and contraception for low income areas. That would reduce the need for abortions and probably save money long term because many children that would grow up on the government dollar or potentially accumulate public costs through the criminal justice system would never be born.