Juventino[RUS];4666946 said:
But now there are more /colored/ people than whites in 'Murica for 2nd time in history, they can create monolithic community sooner or later
But that's far from monolithic. As Enron pointed out in Mexico, when you have the Latinos hating on the blacks and vice versa, it's not like you're talking about a single voice, a single culture.
Which, IMO, is good. Pluralism is the wave of the future, so we're gonna have to either deal with it or hand out tax incentives for white people to have more kids.
Are you at least in favor of the Castle doctrine?
In theory, yes. In practice, that's where things get ugly. When Yoshihiro Hattori comes knocking on the wrong door as a Japanese exchange student, there really need to be limits before blowing the kid away.
My concern is that different people have preferences for different statistical math. The price of how many innocents get killed as a tradeoff for how many guilty get shot is a little troubling to me. Deadly force on an unarmed person knocking on your door shouldn't be the rule.
But I also know there are a lot of people I've met at gun shows who believe that the chance of killing just one intruder is worth the tradeoff of accidentally killing 5-10 innocents or family members as the price -- even if they're not doing that direct math.
Black on black murder is most likely the number one cause of death for premature black deaths.
Easy. But nobody gives a rat's ass about that -- white or black, I'm afraid.
What's sort of amusing is that both the Zimmerman case and what's happening in Ferguson are due to whites killing blacks. But if a white cop kills a white person or vice versa (black cop) you probably won't even hear about it.
No way. White people get the coverage by default. It just is. 2x if it's by a black person, but 100x if it's a cute girl and she's killed by someone white or black.