Mauro Camoranesi (11 Viewers)
- Thread starter Camo
- Start date
It was probably a matter of length of contract than anythingelse.
Nobody in their frame of mind would accept one-year contract as a premise for building the team, since if you don't pick up results in a matter of Week 3 or 4, you would be fired. There is a difference between resigning on one's own will, and resigning because of options available (rather lack of).
Seven,
By your analogy, if somebody pointed gun at you to jump off the cliff, then the person who pointed gun is not responsible as he did not commit any direct causation?
Anyway, vlatko is right. If the board is willing to spend money on Iaquinta then I just don't see any reason why Camo and Trez shouldnt get their money. 7m Euro for Trez?
You can't even get decent rotational set-up with that kind of money these days. If Arsenal's offer is the best we can get, we might as well player exchange deal with Roma, Inter and Milan and get the best deal possible. Yes, we are going to strengthen the opponents, but as if we are going to win Lo Scudetto next year. Trez is not young pup anymore so he will only strenghten opposition when we are not directly challenging. That is better than giving away one of the most prized asset for virtually free.
Nobody in their frame of mind would accept one-year contract as a premise for building the team, since if you don't pick up results in a matter of Week 3 or 4, you would be fired. There is a difference between resigning on one's own will, and resigning because of options available (rather lack of).
Seven,
By your analogy, if somebody pointed gun at you to jump off the cliff, then the person who pointed gun is not responsible as he did not commit any direct causation?
Anyway, vlatko is right. If the board is willing to spend money on Iaquinta then I just don't see any reason why Camo and Trez shouldnt get their money. 7m Euro for Trez?
You can't even get decent rotational set-up with that kind of money these days. If Arsenal's offer is the best we can get, we might as well player exchange deal with Roma, Inter and Milan and get the best deal possible. Yes, we are going to strengthen the opponents, but as if we are going to win Lo Scudetto next year. Trez is not young pup anymore so he will only strenghten opposition when we are not directly challenging. That is better than giving away one of the most prized asset for virtually free.I havent been following too much news right now, and I have yet to see a report that said DD was offered the same contract as Ranieri. From what I knew Didi was offered a year extension with significant but not substantial payrise. Given how much Didi was paid last year I thought his contract claim was valid and deserved full support of the management.
But if what you wrote is true then I will take my words back, and apologise.
Anyway, in my opinion, management did not seriously court Didi. I suspect Buffon had a hand in this, and got his way in the end. Fair enough, I liked Didi as a player and man, but Buffon is arguably the best keeper the world has ever seen, I won't complain if that was the cost to keep him here. But seriously Camo and Trez deserve some payrise. I would be insulted if I was Trez that the management thinks Iaquinta is his viable replacement.
But if what you wrote is true then I will take my words back, and apologise.
Anyway, in my opinion, management did not seriously court Didi. I suspect Buffon had a hand in this, and got his way in the end. Fair enough, I liked Didi as a player and man, but Buffon is arguably the best keeper the world has ever seen, I won't complain if that was the cost to keep him here. But seriously Camo and Trez deserve some payrise. I would be insulted if I was Trez that the management thinks Iaquinta is his viable replacement.
He left for other reasons and you know them very well.
It is not wrong to ask more money not for Zlatan nor the others, he asked for a rise 3.4 mil the offer is 3 mil. If he will leave just for the 400K I won't care at all.
Trezeguet received an offer lower than he is getting now, it was kinda disrespectful in some way, the case is different there, in other words the Board tried to tell that he is not wanted anymore.
Dider's case is totally different, his salary was already a joke (some managers even earn above 10 millions), the offer got the message of Trezeguet's, "you don't worth more than this, take it or leave" kind of deal. Didier's reasons wasn't money anyway, he wanted to bring players he wants, control fully the transfers, which was rejected by the board.
It is not wrong to ask more money not for Zlatan nor the others, he asked for a rise 3.4 mil the offer is 3 mil. If he will leave just for the 400K I won't care at all.
Trezeguet received an offer lower than he is getting now, it was kinda disrespectful in some way, the case is different there, in other words the Board tried to tell that he is not wanted anymore.
Dider's case is totally different, his salary was already a joke (some managers even earn above 10 millions), the offer got the message of Trezeguet's, "you don't worth more than this, take it or leave" kind of deal. Didier's reasons wasn't money anyway, he wanted to bring players he wants, control fully the transfers, which was rejected by the board.
Still no Camoranesi deal Wednesday 13 June, 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mauro Camoranesi has moved a step closer to leaving Juventus after crunch contract talks took place on Wednesday.
Juve sporting director Alessio Secco met with the player’s agent this afternoon where an extension was offered until 2009, but his salary demands remain an obstacle.
“I am disappointed and sad,” noted Sergio Fortunato, his representative, to Radio Radio.
“I guess we will now have to find a solution because there is no way Mauro can stay at Juventus under these conditions.
“He wants a three-year contract, but the club have only offered him a £71,000 a year pay rise,” explained the midfielder’s representative.
“This way we cannot sign a new deal – I don’t think it’s fair to make this kind of offer to a world champion. If these are the conditions, the only thing we can do is move to another club.”
Camoranesi currently earns £1.7m a year and wanted a £400,000 increase in an effort to move him in line with some of the club’s top players.
Fortunato had already warned the Old Lady that the winger could leave and would favour a move to one of Inter, Milan and Roma.
Inter boss Roberto Mancini asked for the player last summer, while Lyon and Valencia could also join the race to sign the Argentine-born star.
Channel 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mauro Camoranesi has moved a step closer to leaving Juventus after crunch contract talks took place on Wednesday.
Juve sporting director Alessio Secco met with the player’s agent this afternoon where an extension was offered until 2009, but his salary demands remain an obstacle.
“I am disappointed and sad,” noted Sergio Fortunato, his representative, to Radio Radio.
“I guess we will now have to find a solution because there is no way Mauro can stay at Juventus under these conditions.
“He wants a three-year contract, but the club have only offered him a £71,000 a year pay rise,” explained the midfielder’s representative.
“This way we cannot sign a new deal – I don’t think it’s fair to make this kind of offer to a world champion. If these are the conditions, the only thing we can do is move to another club.”
Camoranesi currently earns £1.7m a year and wanted a £400,000 increase in an effort to move him in line with some of the club’s top players.
Fortunato had already warned the Old Lady that the winger could leave and would favour a move to one of Inter, Milan and Roma.
Inter boss Roberto Mancini asked for the player last summer, while Lyon and Valencia could also join the race to sign the Argentine-born star.
Channel 4
