And why, must i ask, do you people think that 3-5-2 is a defensive formation and that we are more likely to get a good result playing 3-5-2 rather than the 4-3-1-2 or the 4-3-3 or any other 4-man backline formation??? That is plain stupid and its because of reasoning like that, that we cant go past that disguisting 3-5-2, cause people think that whenever we need a good result we need to switch to the 3 man backline. Well i say BULLSH-IT!!
Why not play a more defencive 4-3-1-2?? Why not play that formation where players will be instructed to not attack as much, but to sit and wait for the counter;s?? $#@! the 3-5-2, $#@! 3-man backline!! Just $#@! it!
Why not play a more defencive 4-3-1-2?? Why not play that formation where players will be instructed to not attack as much, but to sit and wait for the counter;s?? $#@! the 3-5-2, $#@! 3-man backline!! Just $#@! it!
