Where were you guys when shit went down in Cambodia, Rwanda or Darfur? why don't you guys embargo China for Tibet ? that's the hypocrisy I'm talking about. You can spin it all around but the only reason a guy like you talks about standing up for the Palestinians is because it involves Israel. You wouldn't give two shits about them otherwise
You surly have no moral superiority to make demands or put us in our place and that's whats really killing you. even worse is you don't have any kind of real leverage to make Israel "bend the knee", that's it for us, last stop and no matter how bad "economically" the country is doing, we will never pack up and leave for a better welfare check , we aren't Europeans.
One serious thought though, actually a main reason why we and the Palestinians aren't getting along is that we are very similar in mentality. We share much more values with them then with Europeans and that's another thing some arrogant Europeans choose to ignore when applying their double standards.
Those are some pathetic examples, wich is very telling for your hypocrisy, and comical since you accuse others of it.
First of all, the EU untill recent was mostly working on creating an alliance to protect itself, and only had peacekeeping force (mostly sponsered by america) during that time.
When China started to up their efforts in tibet, we were mostly trying not to shit out pants from the soviets.
Cambodia, Rwanda and Darfur, were internal genocides. Quite a different story when its not one country crossing the others border and pulling shit. You need to breach a border unwanted for this. We werent ready in Cambodia(america was tho), but we were ready to do that in Rwanda. And its funny you name that, as belgium lost its 10 blue helmet peacekeepers there, beeing tortured and hacked by machettes. But hey, just belgium right.
Darfur ? UN peacekeeping forces also there.
So i'm really not seeing the point of mentionning those. UN peacekeeping force does breach the border, but to keep the peace, wich is kinda what you want in a genocide.
China, Russia and Israel are your 3 examples where a nation crossed the border and annexed, togheter with barely or ALOT of killing.
China started doing that long before the EU, and its a tricky situation today
Russia took back a given province wich has a large majority of native russians who were pro annexation. apart from typical russian "sending some troops to cause havoc in the riots without the russian badge", no bloodshed.
Israel ? No excuse. Actually, considering the holocaust, Israel should be the last nation to pull this shit onto another.
"moral superiority ?" Your prime minister is going in the media saying the worst bullshit, always holocause related, and europe just takes it and shuts up. Pathetic. The fact is that Israel are killing and destroying palestina people for decades. We have had several proposals, but israel doesnt give a shit, because we dont embargo anyway. We should.
Palestinian people and you dont get along, cause you stole their land, and have kept doing that for a few decades now, make their life miserable, and when a terrorist organisation trows a rocket, you respond by bombing city's of innocents.
Thats why the world hates israel. And why more and more word comes up to why our leaders shouldnt just take israels crap and allow it
- - - Updated - - -
So, in your opinion, the proper response to a regional conflict would be start WW3?
Did we start WW3 with russia when they annexed Krim (wich they had right to do, i dont agree on the EU standpoint).
Nope, we told them to stop it, and put embargo's when they didnt. Later we told them to undo their annexation, they refused, second embargo's
and same story for the third round.
The proper response is to respond when they talk historical crap in the press. And to threaten and give embargo's when they pull military shit.