I'm not say8ing Bush doesn't have alot of blood on his hands. But Mao, Hitler and Stalin killed tens of millions of people.
And George Bush isn't making anyone strap explosives onto their bodies and walk into crowds of pilgrims and blow themselves up. He is responsible for the deaths in Iraq committed by American forces, not those crazy fuckers who use terrorism in response. That was their choice.
I'm not say8ing Bush doesn't have alot of blood on his hands. But Mao, Hitler and Stalin killed tens of millions of people.
And George Bush isn't making anyone strap explosives onto their bodies and walk into crowds of pilgrims and blow themselves up. He is responsible for the deaths in Iraq committed by American forces, not those crazy fuckers who use terrorism in response. That was their choice.
I'm not say8ing Bush doesn't have alot of blood on his hands. But Mao, Hitler and Stalin killed tens of millions of people.
And George Bush isn't making anyone strap explosives onto their bodies and walk into crowds of pilgrims and blow themselves up. He is responsible for the deaths in Iraq committed by American forces, not those crazy fuckers who use terrorism in response. That was their choice.
The blood of the soldiers is indeed in the hands of Bush because the war shouldn't have been fought anyway. His decisions lead to their deaths, and for what? Oil and other bullshit.
So yes, the blood is on the hands of the Bush administration. The "terrorists" are just defending their territory.
Accordingly, if famine victims are included, a minimum of around 10 million deaths — 6 million minimum from famine and 4 million minimum from other causes — are attributable to the regime[80], with a number of recent historians suggesting a likely total of around 20 million, citing much higher victim totals from executions, gulags, deportations and other causes.[81] Adding 6–8 million famine victims to Erlikman's estimates above, for example, would yield a total of between 15 and 17 million victims.
They even go as far as 50-60m. And when they say 20m, at least 60% of them are people who died in famines.
However you put it he was responsible for millions of deaths, although not even close to what the west says, and as Andy said, i really don't see a point in a number when you talk about millions.
The blood of the soldiers is indeed in the hands of Bush because the war shouldn't have been fought anyway. His decisions lead to their deaths, and for what? Oil and other bullshit.
So yes, the blood is on the hands of the Bush administration. The "terrorists" are just defending their territory.
They even go as far as 50-60m. And when they say 20m, at least 60% of them are people who died in famines.
However you put it he was responsible for millions of deaths, although not even close to what the west says, and as Andy said, i really don't see a point in a number when you talk about millions.
That's not true, that's an assumption and a generalization. It's just factual that Stalin, Mao, and Hitler did more to harm their civilizations and populations.
Again, let me reiterate, I'm not trying to say Bush is the man or didn't do anything wrong, it's just not a comparison.