Iraqi shot dead attempting goal (11 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
Vinny Del Pogba
Jul 10, 2006
6,753
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #82
    What about the 1.5 million Iraqis killed throughout this faux war?

    Or how about the 15 other Iraqis killed on the same day as this footballer?

    Oh, I remember now. He's a footballer.
    I'm not say8ing Bush doesn't have alot of blood on his hands. But Mao, Hitler and Stalin killed tens of millions of people.

    And George Bush isn't making anyone strap explosives onto their bodies and walk into crowds of pilgrims and blow themselves up. He is responsible for the deaths in Iraq committed by American forces, not those crazy fuckers who use terrorism in response. That was their choice.
     
    Apr 12, 2004
    77,165
    #84
    I'm not say8ing Bush doesn't have alot of blood on his hands. But Mao, Hitler and Stalin killed tens of millions of people.

    And George Bush isn't making anyone strap explosives onto their bodies and walk into crowds of pilgrims and blow themselves up. He is responsible for the deaths in Iraq committed by American forces, not those crazy fuckers who use terrorism in response. That was their choice.
    That's what i'm saying.

    I'm not saying by any measure the man is innocent by any means, I just think it's a jump in comparison.
     
    OP
    Vinny Del Pogba
    Jul 10, 2006
    6,753
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #85
    Once you start murdering over a million people, what's the point in the number, IMO. He's the American Mao.
    lol. The American Mao?

    Mao killed tens of millions of his own people.

    Bush has started an unpolular war which, on the grand scale of things, pales in comparison to the wars persecuted by Stalin, Mao, Hitler and others.

    I can't believe I've run across someone that would make me defend Bush. lol
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,118
    #86
    I'm not say8ing Bush doesn't have alot of blood on his hands. But Mao, Hitler and Stalin killed tens of millions of people.

    And George Bush isn't making anyone strap explosives onto their bodies and walk into crowds of pilgrims and blow themselves up. He is responsible for the deaths in Iraq committed by American forces, not those crazy fuckers who use terrorism in response. That was their choice.
    The blood of the soldiers is indeed in the hands of Bush because the war shouldn't have been fought anyway. His decisions lead to their deaths, and for what? Oil and other bullshit.

    So yes, the blood is on the hands of the Bush administration. The "terrorists" are just defending their territory.
     
    Apr 12, 2004
    77,165
    #92
    Including his own people, I've heard estimates range from 12-20MM.
    From Wiki:

    Accordingly, if famine victims are included, a minimum of around 10 million deaths — 6 million minimum from famine and 4 million minimum from other causes — are attributable to the regime[80], with a number of recent historians suggesting a likely total of around 20 million, citing much higher victim totals from executions, gulags, deportations and other causes.[81] Adding 6–8 million famine victims to Erlikman's estimates above, for example, would yield a total of between 15 and 17 million victims.
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    53,975
    #93
    Including his own people, I've heard estimates range from 12-20MM.
    They even go as far as 50-60m. And when they say 20m, at least 60% of them are people who died in famines.
    However you put it he was responsible for millions of deaths, although not even close to what the west says, and as Andy said, i really don't see a point in a number when you talk about millions.
     
    Apr 12, 2004
    77,165
    #94
    The blood of the soldiers is indeed in the hands of Bush because the war shouldn't have been fought anyway. His decisions lead to their deaths, and for what? Oil and other bullshit.

    So yes, the blood is on the hands of the Bush administration. The "terrorists" are just defending their territory.
    The spark was 9/11, which was not defending their territory.

    Also, you have to remember that no one was drafted into the military and made to fight.

    They all joined out of choice.
     
    Apr 12, 2004
    77,165
    #96
    They even go as far as 50-60m. And when they say 20m, at least 60% of them are people who died in famines.
    However you put it he was responsible for millions of deaths, although not even close to what the west says, and as Andy said, i really don't see a point in a number when you talk about millions.
    With what I stated above, if you subtract the 6-8 million from famine, then you still have 7-9 million.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,118
    #97
    ßüякε;1934342 said:
    The spark was 9/11, which was not defending their territory.

    Also, you have to remember that no one was drafted into the military and made to fight.

    They all joined out of choice.
    9/11 was the work of Al Qaeda, a CIA operation and thus our own doing.
     
    Apr 12, 2004
    77,165
    #98
    You see, people in the west will naturally hold their own people in higher esteem, no matter if they're good or bad people.
    That's not true, that's an assumption and a generalization. It's just factual that Stalin, Mao, and Hitler did more to harm their civilizations and populations.

    Again, let me reiterate, I'm not trying to say Bush is the man or didn't do anything wrong, it's just not a comparison.

    You know I hate Bush.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,118
    ßüякε;1934351 said:
    :lol2:

    Sell that propaganda to the insurgents.

    Wait wait wait, scratch that, the insurgents are probably FBI.....
    Again with the laughing. No point in discussing anything with you.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 11)