That's not a valid point at all, because it's only scratching the surface of why it went that way. Valid points are based on facts that reflect things as they were, not as they would appear without further research.
Yes, it's a fact that Marotta's Juve hasn't reached CL yet, but at the same time it's also a fact that a lot of that has to do with the damage Secco has done. So what's the point in praising Secco?
Yes, it's a fact that Marotta's Juve hasn't reached CL yet, but at the same time it's also a fact that a lot of that has to do with the damage Secco has done. So what's the point in praising Secco?
No need to teach me about what is or isn't a valid point: the only valid point in this entire discussion is the achieved results. Secco achieved them 3 seasons out of 4, Marotta is 0 for 1.
How's this for scratching the surface: Secco could have sold, for example, Trez, Camo & Chiellini. We could have played in Serie B for quite a lot longer, we could still be playing there today. Marotta could have done better had Secco left a more balanced squad. Secco just might have had a more difficult job considering what had happened. Marotta just might have a more difficult job considering the current state of affairs, ...
Nothing but could haves & maybes.
I base my opinion on facts/results. If people have problems seeing that up till now Secco's are better than Marotta's, then so be it. There are probably a million different reasons/variables anyway.
