@Cronios:
Look man, I do want new wingbacks but it shouldn't be a priority for both. We have Zebina when healthy is way ahead of grygera and most right backs in the league. Maybe a better backup for Z. Then we have DC who hasn't been given a good enough chance. We got Canna by replacing mellberg. You say you want two worldclass wingbacks, right? You said it in the novel you wrote on the last page. First tell me two that are A) available, B)affordable, and C) "worldclass" by YOUR standards.
Even worldclass wingbacks get beat on their sides. Teams defend as a unit, not individually Cronios. You mentioned what happens if sissoko goes out, well marchisio (whom I think you underrate) is an excellent youthfull ball winner and d'ago lead the league in tackles so I'd say between those two and our worldclass (IMO) tacklers that are canna and chiellini we should be covered in that department.
I just don't see your arguement that two new winbacks are the answer to our teams issues. You would rather have two players whom maybe 5 times a game push forward and cross with let's guess 75percent accuracy not always guanteeing goals all the while have a transparent midfield instead of 1 player that is good and more affordable than your 2 worldclass wingbacks, that has the ability to link all areas of our team together. An allstar backline won't do much with a midfield that can't keep possession or distribute the ball the way they should. Even the best backlines crack and I believe it would again if we have another midfield playing this year like it did last year.
All of our defenders that we have, though some lack in specific departments, work extraordinarily hard for each other and the team. With some smart tactics and organisation from Ciro we will be able to achieve good results. Ranieri had no idea how to defend.
I agree on two new wingbacks, but not before a regista. He would allow all of our players to be able to focus on what they do best as I explained earlier, something 2 wingbacks wouldn't do. IMO worldclass wingbacks are a luxury that we can't afford when a purchase of d'ago at much less the cost would bring more to all areas of the team. Sorry, that just makes more sense to me. I'm not opposed to getting new defenders like santacroce or grosso, but it is to my belief that D'agostino will bring relief to the defense, organisation to the midfield and purpose going forward from that transition from defense to offense.
I agree that the team defends as o unit and thats why i am worried about Dago, being the our first line of defense.
I dont underrate Marchisio, on the contrary i believe that he can perform that role even better, as he is more competent defensively.
But he is not as dynamic as Sissoko, at least not yet.
And as we have seen this year, no one can replace his physicality.
Playing with one midfielder less then the rest of the teams, our flanks and center of the midfield not to be stronger than the average, otherwise it will be easily bullied around.
Camo - Diego - Dago/Marchisio can be a first line of defense, but its not that hard to go past them, esp past Diego, they need a
Strong dynamic and physical DM like - Sissoko To play behind them and close all the gaps. CZ doesnt have the stamina, Marchisio is not fierce enough and Camo def not made for that job. Neither is Dago.
If we move Sissoko to a side, our team will be unbalanced, his side will be a solid side, but not as creative (as he cant pass like our CMs) And other side will be vulnerable.
I believe that Canna and Chiellini are capable enough of passing the ball, 3-9 feet in front of them to Camo or Marchisio.
And they can advance a few meters by the own and pass the ball to Diego.
He can create from there, from the middle of the field to their box.
Where he can find our capable forwards, who can easily find their way from there.
IMO this is how the 4-3-1-2 works. IF the holding DM can distribute the ball thats even better.
Esp if we play defensively and we want to keep possession, closer to our field.
But
what happens if the one who is holding the ball, right in front of our CBs loses the ball? Who is going to catch him?? Canna ? LOL
Thats why i prefer Diego to do the distribution role and even if he is dispossessed, Sissoko will be behind him to recover that ball!
In previous 4-4-2 Dago or Alonso would be really valuable, as they would complement Sissoko's passing lapses. And Sissoko would offer the needed coverage.
However,
as we have seen time and time again. If we dont defend as a team and let alone our defense to do their work. They simply cant cope...
Sad bad true...
I will be very pleased if we can afford to have a dedicated creative midfielder (Diego), without losing much from our defensive coverage, which will be practically with one man lesser than it was now.
I dont think that we can afford two less and put one behind the other!
(welcomed, but too much to ask with that defense, IMO)
If Dago was more capable defensively, or if our back four were more competent, we could.
As to what i want, i think that our priority is to find a permanent replacement to Zebi. We should sell him or Grygera to an EPL team. And make an investment that will last at least 5-6 years. A player near 26 year old or less, at 8-10mil.
It doesnt necessarily have to buy Italian. I would follow Arsenal's example.
I have a few players in mind from the French and German league. Fast, young, able to perform a sliding tackle, a decent cross and Grygera's stamina!
Secco may not be able to pull that off and our board wouldnt afford/justify that.
My taste is irrelevant, so i will keep it real if you insist for a an example:
For our left flank, i believe that we should sell Moli asap or give/co own him to Genoa and use the money we got for their half, to bring Criscito back.
(their money back, the loan of Molinaro and 50% of his contract would be suffice to buy his half back)
And keep DC as the offensive option. IF he fails for any reason, sell him by x-mas and bring a Grosso. No problem, if Criscito is already here...
Therefore we would have a "young and Italian" defense

. 2 Italian CBs, one Italian keeper and LB should be Italian enough to afford/tolerate a straniero RB but with serie A exp. I dont dare to ask for Roma's, Fiorentina's or Inter's RB's
But we can go for Lazio's for ex. Or trying a la Mellberg and get Napoli's or Udinese's CB/RB. That would be double effective, we either earn one more solution in the RB, or the assurance of our future CB twin. Its a win win situation there and with Canna, Legro around, we can afford to risk that, or keep him as RB!
We offered 11mil pounds to Udine for Dago, with that money we can buy Santacroce, a fullback like A.Santos and bring back Criscito too.
The sales and salaries of Mellberg, Zebi/Grygera and Molinaro can pay for their salaries and any difference.
And we can still buy Dago if we sell Treze and or Almiron/Tiago/Poulsen.
And udine accept realistic conditions...
Usually i de prefer defenders able to defend first. But it is imperative for the 4-3-1-2 to become multi-dimensional, that the full-backs can be potential threats and force the opposition to keep their lines widened!
A front attack only, no matter how skilled Diego is and how resourceful Dago can be, cannot penetrate an over-crowed midfield.
If Zebi stays healthy and plays like he did in the last game and DC is given a chance, then we would be ok. But the chances of this to happen, are far less than Marchisio or even CZ, Tiago and Poulsen, all fail to play that deep play-maker role. IMO Marchisio is good enough for the job, he has good stamina, great tactical awareness and better defensive skills to stop the man who goes past Diego, than Dago. Tiago can also do that in theory, but he cant on the field!
CZ might not be fit enough to close the gaps fast. But Poulsen!! Poulsen is a good passer and he also knows how to defend! I believe we can try him there.
But then
we have to chose which flank Sissoko should waste offensively.
That would probably be the left flank, as Camo will cover the right one. That would also need no need for Molinaro or Criscito there. As defensive coverage will be present. But
we will have an urgent need of an offensive fullback there! Not Molinaro...
Our left would be completely dead...
Do you understand, now, why i insist that we need an upgrade there??
We just cant afford this, with these defenders.
And What happens if Camo gets injured and we have to move Sissoko to other side? We also have to keep an option there too.
80% chances are that Zebi will be injured again, as he always is when we need him. And what are we expecting from Grygera to do, in order to become a threat?
And if the fullback goes wide, how can we expect from Canna to run and track the open spaces at his age??

Our defense cant support such an option, either Ferrara will anticipate it, as i believe he already did.
Or we will learn with the hard way, conceding stupid goals, just like this year...
Selling Poulsen, putting Dago there and betting that this defense will hold by their own is a wild risk! Also betting that they can do the offensive part too, is just insane...
Cronios might have thought he was a double account of mine
Not really, you are bold enough to hold your ground!