Gaetano D'Agostino (34 Viewers)
- Thread starter Fellas
- Start date
- Status
Let's hope Giovinco gets a chance to play, and is not shipped out.
4-3-1-2 with Sissoko, Marchisio, and D'Agostino as the starters, and Camo, Poulsen, and Zanetti as the backups? I am not too sure Camo will be happy with a substitute role (if he is healthy), but then again we can sometimes play 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-2-1 to accommodate some of our players.
4-3-1-2 with Sissoko, Marchisio, and D'Agostino as the starters, and Camo, Poulsen, and Zanetti as the backups? I am not too sure Camo will be happy with a substitute role (if he is healthy), but then again we can sometimes play 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-2-1 to accommodate some of our players.
Playing 4-3-1-2 sucks big time. That means that we are only going to have one player (Diego) who can beat his players since Camo is obviously going to end up on the bench if D'ago arrives. And if Diego doesnt play good in a game then we would have huge problems creating anything from midfield. As good as Marchisio, Sissoko and D'ago are, they dont have that special thing that Giovinco, Diego and Camo have.
But then again, im against every formation where Diego and Giovinco doesnt get to play together.
All i hope is that D'ago is Tiagos replacement.
But then again, im against every formation where Diego and Giovinco doesnt get to play together.
All i hope is that D'ago is Tiagos replacement.
So you are telling me that you think D'ago and Sissoko are going to take care of the left and right side? So we are going to go from Camo and Nedved to Sissoko and D'ago, wow..that sucks.
Wake up, 4-2-3-1 is definitely the way to go. You get two defensive midfielders in Sissoko and Marchisio, then you get width in Giovinco and Camo and at the same time Diego could play as a playmaker behind one of our strikers.
Wake up, 4-2-3-1 is definitely the way to go. You get two defensive midfielders in Sissoko and Marchisio, then you get width in Giovinco and Camo and at the same time Diego could play as a playmaker behind one of our strikers.
I assume you're counting on Del Piero to be a sub next season and that ain't gonna happen.
4-2-3-1 is bad because:
1) Sissoko and Marchisio are not so good at passing so our front line would lose it's essence and it wouldn't be affective.
2) Camo is injury prone so you can't really count on him.
4-3-1-2 could work very well though and we saw how good D'Agostino was this season. We'd need better fullbacks, though.
4-2-3-1 is bad because:
1) Sissoko and Marchisio are not so good at passing so our front line would lose it's essence and it wouldn't be affective.
2) Camo is injury prone so you can't really count on him.
4-3-1-2 could work very well though and we saw how good D'Agostino was this season. We'd need better fullbacks, though.
Yes, I think Del Piero should be subbed next year. I think Giovinco and Diego could fill the gap he leaves behind. I mean, Giovinco just got to play 1/3 of what Del Piero and Nedved did and at the same time he got more then 7 assists. Why dont u get that Giovinco is to good to sub?
Is that all? I think Diego, Giovinco, Camo and our striker could take care of the offense as long as Sissoko and Marchisio do their job at back. And, who said Marchisio is a bad passer?
Is that all? I think Diego, Giovinco, Camo and our striker could take care of the offense as long as Sissoko and Marchisio do their job at back. And, who said Marchisio is a bad passer?
- Status