Fabio Quagliarella (94 Viewers)

Would you keep Quagliarella?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe


Results are only viewable after voting.
Dec 31, 2008
22,910
Just went through the stats thread. Did some numbers - Total minutes/(G+A)

Quag - 80.25
Gio - 134.19
Mirko - 136.54
Matri - 174.17

Effectiveness they say :howler:
 

Buck Fuddy

Lara Chedraoui fanboy
May 22, 2009
10,877
Absolute must. Had a decent shift yesterday, but he needs a bit more game time or starts, so he can be among the goals. Another CL goal will be fantastic for his confidence going into the final stretch of the season.
:confused:

What was so decent about it?


Sucks to be Quag right now. From all our forwards, he's most likely to score, but he's also the worst (by very, very far imo) when it comes to general play. For some reason, he's really out of sync with the rest of the team.
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
I thought he got involved well, distributed well to the flanks, held the ball up with his back to goal and was fairly mobile. Made some good runs too, which were flagged off, and he wasn't off on one of them either. The chip to Barzagli was pretty sweet too. I thought he linked our play well. Infact, after Gio's sub, you would've noticed Juve went on the offensive again, with Quags arrival, till which time they were soaking up the pressure after conceding one.

Yes, he is the most likely to score because he has a striker's instinct. His awareness to goal is probably the highest of all our forwards which is a good skill to possess. Quag has been the most unfortunate circumstantially, because he gets almost no continuity on this team, seeing how stubborn Conte is with his choices. You can't play with freedom if you're always looking over your shoulder to be subbed. There is bound to be anxiety.
 

Klin

نحن الروبوتات
May 27, 2009
61,692
If we'll push you a bit more you'll be praising him for attacking the correct side, running using both feet and for wearing his jersey the correct way. :D
 
Nov 17, 2012
3,030
Quag should've had a hattrick... but two goals were cancelled. One offside when he wasn't offside and another one that was cleared over the line but not awarded... and he shot the goal that was blocked but allowed to di natale to score.
:tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport:

Him and Pirlo coming on completely changed the game, Italy looked like a team bruised and beaten before their introduction, after which they looked like a team fighting tooth and nail for their very lives... Gosh why was Lippi so one bloody dimensional in South Africa... :(
 

fredrik

Senior Member
Aug 7, 2011
7,239
I thought he got involved well, distributed well to the flanks, held the ball up with his back to goal and was fairly mobile. Made some good runs too, which were flagged off, and he wasn't off on one of them either. The chip to Barzagli was pretty sweet too. I thought he linked our play well. Infact, after Gio's sub, you would've noticed Juve went on the offensive again, with Quags arrival, till which time they were soaking up the pressure after conceding one.

Yes, he is the most likely to score because he has a striker's instinct. His awareness to goal is probably the highest of all our forwards which is a good skill to possess. Quag has been the most unfortunate circumstantially, because he gets almost no continuity on this team, seeing how stubborn Conte is with his choices. You can't play with freedom if you're always looking over your shoulder to be subbed. There is bound to be anxiety.

so why has his best season in serie a only amounted to 13 goals? 235 games in serie a , 72 goals. Thats about a goal every 222 min. i would say his striker instincts are average
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
Do you think he would've had only 13 goals at his first season at Juve had the injury not hapoened? I don't think so, it probably also had to do with the fact that he was playing for arguably the biggest team in his graph. What do most strikers average playing for team's like Samp and Udine? He had 20 plus goals including the urfa cup. Not a bad season for a striker a smaller club like Udinese.

As for striker's instinct, kindly refer to the video above your post. Good evening.
 

Goodfella

Senior Member
Nov 11, 2012
4,518
Do you think he would've had only 13 goals at his first season at Juve had the injury not hapoened? I don't think so, it probably also had to do with the fact that he was playing for arguably the biggest team in his graph. What do most strikers average playing for team's like Samp and Udine? He had 20 plus goals including the urfa cup. Not a bad season for a striker a smaller club like Udinese.

As for striker's instinct, kindly refer to the video above your post. Good evening.
Why do you keep arguing with that non-factor?

It's not really productive, bro.
 

fredrik

Senior Member
Aug 7, 2011
7,239
Do you think he would've had only 13 goals at his first season at Juve had the injury not hapoened? I don't think so, it probably also had to do with the fact that he was playing for arguably the biggest team in his graph. What do most strikers average playing for team's like Samp and Udine? He had 20 plus goals including the urfa cup. Not a bad season for a striker a smaller club like Udinese.

As for striker's instinct, kindly refer to the video above your post. Good evening.
gio got 15 for parma. matri scored 10 for cag. in half a season. quag would only be considered a good striker for a midtable team. there is a clear reason why he was playing for lesser teams for so long, and he continues to prove how average he really is here.

1 nice goal to prove how great he is, really?
how about 16000 min of serie a football and just 72 goals. good night.
 

Juve_fanatic

Second coolest member!
Apr 5, 2006
7,618
You people can compare our forwards as much as you like but the bottom line is that they all suck and are not fit to play in juve and at this high level. Giovinco and vucinic are wingers so they are not even strikers. Matri is just very mediocare as well as quags and bendtner is not even worth mentioning. The kind of upgrade we need in the attack is the same as we got in our midfield. From choosing who is better between poulsen, tiago, zanetti and aqualiani to standard of marchisio-pirlo-vidal.

From choosing between matri, quags, gio and vuci to a standard of suarez-cavani
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,174
You people can compare our forwards as much as you like but the bottom line is that they all suck and are not fit to play in juve and at this high level. Giovinco and vucinic are wingers so they are not even strikers. Matri is just very mediocare as well as quags and bendtner is not even worth mentioning. The kind of upgrade we need in the attack is the same as we got in our midfield. From choosing who is better between poulsen, tiago, zanetti and aqualiani to standard of marchisio-pirlo-vidal.

From choosing between matri, quags, gio and vuci to a standard of suarez-cavani
This :tup:

+Rep :beer:
 

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,923
You people can compare our forwards as much as you like but the bottom line is that they all suck and are not fit to play in juve and at this high level. Giovinco and vucinic are wingers so they are not even strikers. Matri is just very mediocare as well as quags and bendtner is not even worth mentioning. The kind of upgrade we need in the attack is the same as we got in our midfield. From choosing who is better between poulsen, tiago, zanetti and aqualiani to standard of marchisio-pirlo-vidal.

From choosing between matri, quags, gio and vuci to a standard of suarez-cavani
This.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 90)