Fabio Cannavaro (8 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,901
I won't vote in the poll because there are some conditions that need to be met in order to vote FOR, and other conditions to vote AGAINST.

I'm AGAINST if we have enough money to buy younger but still experienced defender of high quality, while strenghtening some other positions in the meantime.

I'm FOR if we spend all our money on other positions and the choice is Canna or no-one, or Canna or "Knezevic". Of course, i'm talking about signing him on a one year contract, as the reports suggest.
 
OP
Dostoevsky

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,980
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #132
    He'd shine here.

    Well since you put it that way:D

    :beer:

    But trez/iq? that one will be a painful one to watch.
    With Diego/Gio behind I don't think Trez could do a good job.It's prefect for Amauri.

    Iaquinta is not that good.

    I won't vote in the poll because there are some conditions that need to be met in order to vote FOR, and other conditions to vote AGAINST.

    I'm AGAINST if we have enough money to buy younger but still experienced defender of high quality, while strenghtening some other positions in the meantime.

    I'm FOR if we spend all our money on other positions and the choice is Canna or no-one, or Canna or "Knezevic". Of course, i'm talking about signing him on a one year contract, as the reports suggest.
    You know this is the case.

    Canna or Senderos? :p
    Oh c'mon now. :p
     

    Amaurisimo

    Senior Member
    Dec 8, 2007
    4,622
    my 1st option would be Gallas otherwise Cano for sure..
    i dont know why some of you dont want him, we need quality players regardless if they "left us" or not..

    I was sorry when we could not get Stankovic, as board listened supporters..

    also i was surprised that some fans did not like idea of getting Lampard too..

    We need 3-4 starters if we are going to win something next year..All this BS talk about looser coach is useless until we get new players..
     

    Mark

    The Informer
    Administrator
    Dec 19, 2003
    97,622
    Like Alen said, yes at my conditions but if we can get a very good one that's not too expensive and younger then there's no choice, screw Canna.
     
    OP
    Dostoevsky

    Dostoevsky

    Tzu
    Administrator
    May 27, 2007
    88,980
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #137
    We CANNOT afford a new/better defender (DC) I'm afraid because we're going to cover some other postions.Even our board said that our priority will be to buy Nedved's replacement which means ~25mln euros.Changing our formation could mean the end of Tiago so a new midfielder as well.

    If we can get Agger,Marquez or Ivanovic let's!

    but I don't think we can so it's Cannavaro or Lugano.Your call.

    Of course it's not the case. We have 500m euro for transfers. FUCK SUCKO for not buying 4 defenders, Diego and 2 more midfielders. Instead of buying Vidic, we'll buy the old Cannavaro. :wallbang:
    Yeah sadly some people really think that.
     

    Jim_Boi

    Senior Member
    Oct 7, 2007
    1,548
    anyway, about Canna.

    - He's free
    - A bit old but could bring the experience needed
    - Would replace Andrade/Knezevic
    - Would have to cut his wages
    - Would have to come on his knees an apologize for leaving while the boat was sinking

    and f*cking Asamoah scored and it's too late to buy him now right Secco?
    I really think that Udinese will buy him if they have the option in the loan agreement.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)