That's one of the big lies being purported. It's a lie. With Ferrara as manager, no system could have saved us. The players were not good enough, the manager was not good enough, and the overall chemistry in the team just wasn't there. Again, you're using Diego as a scapegoat for more than the roll he played, like he can be at fault for his own purchase. This sort of thing is VERY disingenuous of you.
We didn't have to lose 10M in the process. We could have kept him and given him another season, like we did with all sorts of other players.
We bought him for 25m, sold him for 15, that's 10m lost. Basic math really.
How can you not make him a scapegoat when everything was done to suit him, he was the one to take us to the next level, yet he failed. He was a huge factor but not the only one, I already said that a countless number of times.
You don't. And while I thought Diego would be better, we should have kept him. He was one of the only bright spots last season.
Ah, the infamous "he was the least stinking piece of crap, from a huge pile of crap". Great.
Exactly. Whatever Vlatko said is being discredited because Modric is Croat, that's bullshit.
That was the case couple of years ago, that is the case now. That's why I'll never let this go. When all this started I was ridiculed even though I had in-depth knowledge of Modric and just as good knowledge of Diego as everyone else, only they knew very little of Modric. But I was Croat so I'm obviously wrong.
Hypotetical situation; Buck or Chester or anyone say Lukaku is better than Rossi. I'm supposed to laugh at them because Lukaku is Belgian? Or should I look at it the reasonable way; they've seen Lukaku play a 100 times more than me, since I obviously don't watch the Belgian league, so maybe they know something I don't. It's a safe bet we've both saw Rossi for Villareal the same number of times and have the same knowledge of him. But not, they're Belgian, they must be biased about Belgian players.