Should've, would've, could've.
Aren't... understanding... the... premise.
In terms of opportunity cost, it makes more sense to give Diego another chance instead of selling him for a net 10M loss. Chances are he would improve, meaning we could have recouped even more of his transfer fee if we still intended to sell him.
It's simple cause and effect. Diego was the cause, 4-3-3 was the effect. Ferrara was just the executioner. He played what everyone wanted him to play and by everyone I mean most of all you.
So despite Ferrara claiming he wanted to use the 4-3-1-2 before Diego arrived, Diego not only
caused the system to be implemented, but its eventual failure.
Dude... forget high school, did you even graduate middle school?
Scapegoating. Stop it.
No, just immature, unreasonable thinking. Read the edit:
Hypotetical situation; Buck or Chester or anyone say Lukaku is better than Rossi. I'm supposed to laugh at them because Lukaku is Belgian? Or should I look at it the reasonable way; they've seen Lukaku play a 100 times more than me, since I obviously don't watch the Belgian league, so maybe they know something I don't. It's a safe bet we've both saw Rossi for Villareal the same number of times and have the same knowledge of him. But not, they're Belgian, they must be biased about Belgian players.
I think you've proven enough that whatever comparable player to Modric is discussed, you'll choose Modric. That's fine, but you don't act like you aren't biased as hell.