Yea. it confuses me too. For me creativity is the ability to create chances
NO!!! Creativity, is the ability to create/invent different kind of chances,
when we have a standard, typical method to attack that involves no surprise element and initiative, we lack creativity.
For ex using 2 DMS to defend and our wingers to try those desperate long balls as our only attacking pattern, (like we do) , this is not "creativity", despite creating chances (on theory)
i would rather have "creativity" problems and play so so, but be on top of tree, than play like Barcelona, fantasy football and end up in the middle of table
creativity doesnt necessarily means we have to use a fantasista, although a fantasista invents a different attacking pattern every single time he attacks, using the same player to try exactly the same thing, would also a be predictable, "non-creative" effort.
But using a long Neddy/Stanko shot, once,
A nice cross by Camo the other time,
a Tiago/Alonso nice "though pass" by the next time
and a straight full power penetration ala Drogba by Amaury is hard to predict or anticipate.
And give us so many options to penetrate almost every defense...
and off we go again... same discussions in every thread.
Let me just add one more thing; If poulsen was EXACTLY the same player he is now, but called 'poulsinho' and if he would have had those fancy dread-locks and constantly saying things like 'I'm the special one', everyone would have been happy. It's because we signed someone with a not-so-classy image, that all of these discussions are going on. I never said i was a friend of poulsen, but what he's showing is alright to me. Saw Nasri in the arsenal game? Well he IS one of those fancy boys everyone wanted to see at juve, and how many balls did he touch in the friendly? 2? 3? Nah, thanks. I prefer someone who contributes to the team rather then to the fancy dribbling shit.
The problem with Poulsen is that he adds absolutely nothing to our squad,
we actually need a different type of player, we are well stacked up with DMs, we dont need another one.
Sissoko is better and more promising than him,
Zanetti is experienced and more efficient than him and Marchisio is ready to fill the gaps and even offer some creativity.
What we actually need is a player to complete them, a CM like Alonso, someone who may add smth in our squad, the right pass, at the right man, at the right moment could work wonders with our team and present us a way out at the usual "dead end" conditions, we face.
We have no player to dictate our game, to share the ball properly and calmly, according to the needs of the game
and give us an alternative attacking solution when our flanks are shut down and our forwards are cut off.
A DM cant offer any help at these moments, no one expects from Poulsen to do that and that means that we got our selves a tool we already had, instead of the tool we really need. We sacrificed our allocated sum from our transfer budget, to buy such a player.
Not to mention this certain selection we made has no future, Sissoko is our future, Zanetti our present and Marchisio our future, there is no need for such an expensive mediocre player. Once again, we add depth in a place that wasnt needed and ignore our real problems.
Hopefully, Giovinco and Camo used as CM could fill that void and we might actually get Alonso at x-mas transfer period...