As they reported on the BBC article, it shows how keen they were to get him off the wage bill. I haven't read the release but is it true the payment is spread over 5 years lol?
Talking about "on our terms" is a load of hot air that they all say, but sometimes not on your terms is better. PSG are turning down €170m simply because they can, but I think it's obvious that Covid hit us hard, and once he made it clear he was leaving (how recently was this?) it put us on the back foot right away.
Talking about "on our terms" is a load of hot air that they all say, but sometimes not on your terms is better. PSG are turning down €170m simply because they can, but I think it's obvious that Covid hit us hard, and once he made it clear he was leaving (how recently was this?) it put us on the back foot right away.
yes it's 5 years lol
"on our terms" should include no losses by default. look at any other club, they don't sell players below their book value, it's like football management 101. we recorded losses on higuain, matuidi (who was on an expiring contract lol), romero, mandzukic, that list is already way too long. and it's not only psg, real or chelsea who know how to sell, just look at everton: kean wanted to leave, club surely didn't want to keep, yet they record a nice plusvalenza on the deal.
a loss on cristiano ronaldo, jesus. we're running a charity.
- - - Updated - - -
It is 5m less than what we thought initially, not that big of a deal.
He wanted to leave, we wanted a big financial break, just make your peace with it and move on. Someone else would've just rescinded the contract and let him go for free.
He wanted to leave, we wanted a big financial break, just make your peace with it and move on. Someone else would've just rescinded the contract and let him go for free.
and it's of course 14m less than we needed
