Cristiano Ronaldo (92 Viewers)

james95

Senior Member
Sep 2, 2018
1,024
Our record without Ronaldo this season is a grand total of 0 wins. But the moment we win a game in his absence (against a team that hadn’t won in their last 12 btw) the “we play better without him” brigade crawl out of their woodwork.

His goals away at Udinese helped seal it for us at the end ultimately. Maybe we should’ve benched him that game too.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
Jun 16, 2020
12,435
In his first year with us Ronaldo scored a hatrick against Atletico, then he scored two goals against Ajax.

Last year he scored two goals against Lyon

Only this year we can say he was bad in CL, even though he gave Chiesa an assist against Porto.

And again, if we're so much better without him, how come we only won one of the 5 games he missed due to Covid around October and November?
It’s basically the money that comes available without him and the possible reinforcements that make us potentially stronger without Ronaldo.

But it depends who we will sign of course.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
75,004
Around October/November Ronaldo got Covid, he missed 5 games, and we only won one of those 5 games he missed.
That is also on the replacements, who were not up to scratch. Whether it was the whimsical Morata, hapless Dybala, or green Kulusevski. It's obvious that we would have 4 points more at least in that bunch of league games with Crotone, Benevento and Verona, to anyone who watched us up front in those games, but it is what it is. The replacements we have should easily be good enough for two of those games, but Ronaldo has often had to carry the attack, for one reason or another.
 

IlCapitano

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2012
5,614
It’s basically the money that comes available without him and the possible reinforcements that make us potentially stronger without Ronaldo.

But it depends who we will sign of course.
No one we could sign with that money is going to make the team better.

We are not getting Mbappe, De Bruyne etc. and no collection of Icardi's and Dybala's is going to have a bigger impact so I'd much rather keep Ronaldo thank you.

Also, by getting rid of Costa, Dybala, Buffon, Chiellini, Ramsey, Rugani, MDS and Berna's wages you save more than with CR and get more in transfer fees.

There is absolutely no reason or justification, sporting or financial, for getting rid of Ronaldo before the above names, unless he wants to leave.
 
Last edited:
Jun 16, 2020
12,435
No one we could sign with that money is going to make the team better.

We are not getting Mbappe, De Bruyne etc. and no collection of Icardi's and Dybala's is going to have a bigger impact so I'd much rather keep Ronaldo thank you.

Also, by getting rid of Costa, Dybala, Buffon, Chiellini, Ramsey, Rugani, MDS and Berna's wages you save more than with CR and get more in transfer fees.

There is absolutely no reason or justification, sporting or financial, for getting rid of Ronaldo before the above names, unless he wants to leave.
I disagree. You only look to the biggest and most expensive players.

And selling/releasing (or whatever) Ramsey, Dybala, Chiellini, Buffon means you also have to replace them. We aren’t paying the salaries of Costa, Rugani and De Sciglio for now, but I get your point there and agree obviously.

What im trying to say is that the 50/60m gross Ronaldo costs could potentially be used for 2 or 3 good signings, so overall your team could be better. But again it depends on who we will get for that money, if you buy another Ramsey, Bernardeschi and Costa than obviously you won’t improve.
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,177
No one we could sign with that money is going to make the team better.

We are not getting Mbappe, De Bruyne etc. and no collection of Icardi's and Dybala's is going to have a bigger impact so I'd much rather keep Ronaldo thank you.

Also, by getting rid of Costa, Dybala, Buffon, Chiellini, Ramsey, Rugani, MDS and Berna's wages you save more than with CR and get more in transfer fees.

There is absolutely no reason or justification, sporting or financial, for getting rid of Ronaldo before the above names, unless he wants to leave.
I'm sorry, but if you're putting Dybala in that list, might as well add Rabiot, Arthur and Bonucci.
 

DIECI

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2011
2,115
No one we could sign with that money is going to make the team better.

We are not getting Mbappe, De Bruyne etc. and no collection of Icardi's and Dybala's is going to have a bigger impact so I'd much rather keep Ronaldo thank you.

Also, by getting rid of Costa, Dybala, Buffon, Chiellini, Ramsey, Rugani, MDS and Berna's wages you save more than with CR and get more in transfer fees.

There is absolutely no reason or justification, sporting or financial, for getting rid of Ronaldo before the above names, unless he wants to leave.

totally agreed. It is never a winning move getting rid of a superstar. It's always a step back, on the field and off. Ronaldo gave us 29 goals this season in serie A, you are not replacing that. The problem on this team is not Ronaldo, it's the midfield that leaves our defense unprotected and doesn't create anything for our attackers. Get a solid midfield and this team with Ronaldo, Dybala and Chiesa would be a different level next year.
 

IlCapitano

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2012
5,614
I disagree. You only look to the biggest and most expensive players.

And selling/releasing (or whatever) Ramsey, Dybala, Chiellini, Buffon means you also have to replace them. We aren’t paying the salaries of Costa, Rugani and De Sciglio for now, but I get your point there and agree obviously.

What im trying to say is that the 50/60m gross Ronaldo costs could potentially be used for 2 or 3 good signings, so overall your team could be better. But again it depends on who we will get for that money, if you buy another Ramsey, Bernardeschi and Costa than obviously you won’t improve.
You have to replace Ronaldo too and it is much easier to replace players who contribute next to nothing while saving the same amount of money on wages than your best and most decisive player.
 

Pegi

Senior Member
Feb 22, 2019
1,825
A greenpiece activist is more beliavable and convincing with all the bullshit they're spreading compared to tuz.

And maybe Ronaldo can lower his wage demands if he really wants to stay. 36 goals in all comps for $30m in his pocket. That's a pricey return per goal.
Ya but that's still 36 goals.
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,049
totally agreed. It is never a winning move getting rid of a superstar. It's always a step back, on the field and off. Ronaldo gave us 29 goals this season in serie A, you are not replacing that. The problem on this team is not Ronaldo, it's the midfield that leaves our defense unprotected and doesn't create anything for our attackers. Get a solid midfield and this team with Ronaldo, Dybala and Chiesa would be a different level next year.
We spent less and scored more before Ronaldo. So it's pretty clear what needs to be done here. We need to cut costs and build a better all-round team, starting with the foundation once again, not the cherry on top.
People just see it as criticising Cristiano, which is not the case. He did his part but we didn't surround him like we should've done and right now we don't have the money for it. By the time we will, he'll be a pensioner. So it's time to cut him loose if we can and start over.
 
Last edited:

IlCapitano

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2012
5,614
We spent less and scored more before Ronaldo. So it's pretty clear what needs to be done here. We need to cut costs and build a better all-round team, starting with the foundation once again, not the cherry on top.
People just see it as criticising Cristiano, which is not the case. He did his part but we didn't surround him like we should've done and right now we don't have the money for it. By the time we will, he'll be a pensioner. So it's time to cut him loose if we can and start over.
We spent better before.

It's hard to take it as anything else but blaming him when he's the first one out the door. There is absolutely no reason for him to go if much bigger problems stay. We can save the same money without his sale and build a better balanced team around him, not go back to square one and then look for a Ronaldo level player in a year or two.
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,049
We spent better before.

It's hard to take it as anything else but blaming him when he's the first one out the door. There is absolutely no reason for him to go if much bigger problems stay. We can save the same money without his sale and build a better balanced team around him, not go back to square one and then look for a Ronaldo level player in a year or two.
Exactly. Better than throwing it all at one player.

We're not blaming him but his sale could be the key to building a stable foundation again.

We can not. Not even close. If you sell 4-5 players to get the save the same salary, we also have 4-5 holes to fill which is nearly impossible.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
Exactly. Better than throwing it all at one player.

We're not blaming him but his sale could be the key to building a stable foundation again.

We can not. Not even close. If you sell 4-5 players to get the save the same salary, we also have 4-5 holes to fill which is nearly impossible.
Rabiot and Ramsey 7M each, Can 5M and 16M agent fee, 31yo Bonucci 35M and 5M net, then a raise, Szczesny raise doubling his salary, Cancelo-Danilo, Spina-Pelle, Benatia let go, Mandzu let go, Arthur-Pjanic etc etc etc
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,049
Rabiot and Ramsey 7M each, Can 5M and 16M agent fee, 31yo Bonucci 35M and 5M net, then a raise, Szczesny raise doubling his salary, Cancelo-Danilo, Spina-Pelle, Benatia let go, Mandzu let go, Arthur-Pjanic etc etc etc
Yes and that's water down the drain unless you know some time travelling tips... Exactly the reason why we need to tighten to budget now...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 69)