Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (21 Viewers)

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
72,286
Small club. Simple as that, no matter how much Red and Dule try to convince us otherwise.
There was a CL preview article by The Guardian (usually a good footie source) and they rated teams by things like strength, history, romance factor etc and created an aggregate score. Roma and Juventus both had 9 for history.

I can only assume the author is confusing the Roman Empire for AS Roma's history.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
There was a CL preview article by The Guardian (usually a good footie source) and they rated teams by things like strength, history, romance factor etc and created an aggregate score. Roma and Juventus both had 9 for history.

I can only assume the author is confusing the Roman Empire for AS Roma's history.
AS Roma history is a thing?
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,815
There was a CL preview article by The Guardian (usually a good footie source) and they rated teams by things like strength, history, romance factor etc and created an aggregate score. Roma and Juventus both had 9 for history.

I can only assume the author is confusing the Roman Empire for AS Roma's history.
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
39,229
There was a CL preview article by The Guardian (usually a good footie source) and they rated teams by things like strength, history, romance factor etc and created an aggregate score. Roma and Juventus both had 9 for history.

I can only assume the author is confusing the Roman Empire for AS Roma's history.
:lol: :howler: I can only surmise that The Guardian must have selected two players at random from each squad and assigned them a history test, and that both players scored 9 points.
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,710
Inter: 'Juve can't change history'
By Football Italia staff



Inter released a very strong statement condemning Juventus President Andrea Agnelli. “We will not allow anyone to act as if” Calciopoli didn’t happen.


“FC Internazionale is saddened to hear that Juventus president Andrea Agnelli has once again attempted to distort the facts and change history.


“Unfortunately for him, and for Italian football as a whole, 2006 was a disastrous year in which the Scudetto was legitimately awarded to Inter by the FIGC and Juventus were relegated to Serie B along with their reputation.
“Those are the facts. We will not allow anyone to change them or act as if they did not happen.”


Juventus continue to count the 2004-05 and 2005-06 Scudetti in their trophy haul, even though they are not recognised by the FIGC, UEFA or FIFA.


Agnelli had today said farewell to Massimo Moratti, who resigned from the Inter Board of Directors after 20 years.
"He was crazy about the club, so much that he accepted the 2006 Scudetto."
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
72,286
They are right of course, we can't change history like they could.

The funniest part is where they talk about facts, as if they weren't either caught up directly in the scandal, or that they didn't manufacture it to suit them.
 

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
96,016
Mark ‏@OTM_tuZ 4m4 minutes ago

#inter = Statute of limitations #fact You fuckers DID cheat. #calls #passports #herreracoffee #younameit #Juve got f*cked. #fact
 

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
96,016
Does everyone just pretend that these things don't exist?
If we mention it they won't believe us. They don't even read the original verdict saying no games were rigged and shit. The last verdict said Juve are not involved whatsoever but they don't give a shit but believe what inter and the media BS.
 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
29,602
If we mention it they won't believe us. They don't even read the original verdict saying no games were rigged and shit. The last verdict said Juve are not involved whatsoever but they don't give a shit but believe what inter and the media BS.
Do you have any links to this information, btw? Preferably in English.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 17)