I think its for barca fans to bestow legendary status for their club not you and they surely do.
secondly, he did not take the best team of the past decade, he inherited a squad that finished 3rd under Rijkaard (a coach who won CL and league titles with Barca not a noob). He completely transformed their style of play and unleashed messi unto the world in a new role that suited him perfectly. He MADE that group of really talented individuals that Rijkaard failed with into the best team on the planet by a distance and since his period Barca became the best club on the planet. Don't pretend his tenure at Barca was the same as his tenure at Bayern because they are very very different. He obviously came out on top of Mou at Madrid even his assistant did. Mou removed the fear factor to a great extent but didnt exactly do better than barca during his madrid tenure. The fact that removing the fear factor from Pep's barca (despite being less successful) is seen as a job well done is a testament to how good barca were under Pep.
At Bayern he did nothing impressive, won his league titles as expected and went to the semi-finals as expected of Bayern. If Heynckes had stayed the expectation would have been the same not consecutive trebles (and yes I didnt like how he lost those semis but not being as good as Heynckes doesnt mean he is shit, Heynckes is no noob). At City, he is almost on par with Conte and Klopp's team while he is the only one whose club is in involved in the CL. Their football has improved massively compared to previous years thats beyond dispute.
Mou's porto and inter CL wins are really insanely impressive as are his EPL titles against Fergie but he has deteriorated massively. We agree on that. My point was that Conte's resume (though has legendary status for Juve) is still lacking a lot to consider him in the same bracket with that of Mou and Pep's careers. I expect him to get there because I see him as already more effective than both, he just didnt get to coach the really big clubs yet but until then their resumes are better than his. If they all retire at the end of the season, both Pep and Mou would be on hall of fame lists because of their past, Conte and Klopp wouldnt be.
- - - Updated - - -
there would not be any inda momentum and accumulation of WC players in every spot. They would have still been finishing 3rd and ironically more wealthy than they are now.
I'm not a massive barcelona fan such as yourself, so i'm not having an exceptionally subjective bias to whatever coach wins the club of your heart trophee's as both a player and manager.
I understand you tho. As a juventus fan, i have this with Conte.
I understand this great love makes you paint a completely different picture of the facts, its okay.
The Barcelona with Ronaldinho and Deco had come at the end of its cycle under Rijkaard, changing to 4-3-3 but not working all that well. All those players left at the end of the season. Rijkaard had greatly underperformed, but it was mostly on bad purchases and players at the end of their career that massively disappointed such as deco and ronaldinho.
Guardiola came, and shipped out the failures. He allready had Valdes, Abidal, Puyol, Xavi, Iniesta,toure(when he still ran), Messi, eto'o. He was gifted the worlds best rightback with Dani Alves, the defence was finalised with Pique, and through the yought came Busquets, the key holding cm for guardiola
Becomming a worldclass coach, Guardiola should receive the praise for quickly making the perfect players for his system work, and showing just how much frank fucked up.
Today, alot are debating wheter juve's first scudetto is such an achievement, considering how extremely talented the central midfield was. Its a fair point. But when looking at the astonishing amount of talent that barcelona team had, its exponentially more serious for Guardiola.
I do like how he went to city, kicked out all the trash, and made his system work. really shaming all previous coaches