Whats up with this Amauri hating? He's excellent, I don't care if he hasn't score in the first four games I would continue to start him, he is our best forward.
"Playing well" and "being active" is a good indicator for a striker, but it's not end product. Ultimately if he doesn't deliver goals he's useless. We sold Palladino remember.
amauri's workrate is fenomenal,he plays when with iaquinta more so as a SS, when he plays with del piero in teh future you will see will sit up a bit more and play as a proper ST
You do have a point, but right now I'm afraid he is obliged to drift out wide a lot, same goes for Iaquinta. I just don't see anyone else covering those spaces.
You do have a point, but right now I'm afraid he is obliged to drift out wide a lot, same goes for Iaquinta. I just don't see anyone else covering those spaces.
You do have a point, but right now I'm afraid he is obliged to drift out wide a lot, same goes for Iaquinta. I just don't see anyone else covering those spaces.
You're right about that. The only way the Iaquinta - Amauri partnership is really going to work, is if one of them can assume different role from the one they're used to. Both currently play pretty much the same game, which at times causes problems.
But if either of them is going to play a different role (thus being somewhat limited in their exploits), we're probably not going to get the best out of them. Tricky situation
it does work for certain teams, and when you have Diego and Camo in midfield to provide more services. I don't like the fact that our Defenders who play long balls to our strikers, that's bullshit, that's why they play wide. I believe that if we have had Zanneti instead of Tiago last night our midfield would have been much better in passing, and possession!