Alessandro Matri (54 Viewers)

Gian

COME HOME MOGGI
Apr 12, 2009
17,785
We do suck but we often buy players at the peak of their value.

We signed Matri for 17M on deadline day, in the peak of his career, in January when we were in a crisis and only lost 5M. Doesnt sound too bad.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
its the truth, thats why we cant sell any of them...
and thats why we cant recover not even 50% of our acquisition.
No other team is willing to be extra just because a player is Italian, or has performed in Italy...
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
We had to overpay for matri, dont be stupid about that.
And juventus indeed simply has players we bought at their peak, with nice contracts.


Thing is, the teams who could take them off our hands are italian, and they dont got the money

- - - Updated - - -

its the truth, thats why we cant sell any of them...
and thats why we cant recover not even 50% of our acquisition.
No other team is willing to be extra just because a player is Italian, or has performed in Italy...
put a sock in it cronios. They came to us when we had a shit appeal.

They are finished now, and have allmost no one interested in him. Thats not to hard to understand now is it..
 

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
its the truth, thats why we cant sell any of them...
and thats why we cant recover not even 50% of our acquisition.
No other team is willing to be extra just because a player is Italian, or has performed in Italy...
He isn't even featuring for the NT, 12m is a decent price for him. I doubt current Juventus would bid that much, we're in a much better position than we were the winter we bought him.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,938
As most of the non-selling big clubs, we sell our players for less than what we paid.

This goes since the time I started supporting Juve. We always sold our players for less than what we paid. Cases like Zidane are different. In fact, even today we can sell our stars for much more than what we paid (Vidal for example), but big teams rarely sell their stars.

Don't look at it as losing money. We won't lose money if we sell Buffon for 25m eur today, after buying him for almost 50. Juve are a big club, we use our players in their prime, and then get rid of them when we don't need them. It's normal that a 26 year old Matri was more expensive than a 29 year old Matri.

Cron, criticize where there is room for criticizing. Stick to Felipe Melo or Martinez. Here, in Matri's case, you just look foolish.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
We did not have to overpay for MAtri, we could have bought an non Italian from abroad.
We overpaied for him, becuase of the nationalistic ItalJuve project.
We sacrificed performance and millions for that and we ares still paying a price for those strategical mistakes.

And i dont accpet that MAtri is finished, why is he finished? He was not that terrible with us, once upon a team smaller serie A teams, were giving battles for our subs and Matri did ok when he was our starter.
We just made the next step in quality, because we are Juventus and can afford, it doesnt means that the player is bad.
And not bad at every field, he may not suit our needs for goal scoaring, but at reast he is pretty good. He is not at any case a 8-12mil player.
We are just very bad negotiators, who (almost) always overpay when they buy and sell out when they sell...
And Quaq is a proven quality in serie A and not that old, they just know that they can take such players from us on cheap, because this is what we have been doing in the past 7 years, to say the least. (like they also now that we overpay, if we were in need for a matri now, they would still ask more than 15mil from us)

I would really like to see this change. And i hold Conte partially resposnible for this as well, he ought to use MAtri just a bid more, let him shine a bit, have his moment, show he still holds some value, just like he did with Giaccherini and this allowed us to sell him for a nice sum!

We really need to step up our transfer strategy at selling department, generating those much needed extra funds!
 

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
So 17,5m in January for a 26yo Matri who just scored 11 goals in half a season was overpaying, but 12m in summer for 29yo Matri who scored 10 goals in full season is selling under value. How much did you value Matri back then Cron and what is his value now? In numbers? @Cronios
 

Fellas

Farsopoli
Jun 13, 2005
3,136
he was performing and scoring goals like a 'Juventus calibre' striker when he was the #1 guy.
2010–11 16 9
2011–12 31 10
2012–13 22 8

Compare that with Di Natale or Cavani from my previous posts. Maby me and you have different opinios about what is "Juventus calibre". If you want to be a starting striker in Juventus you should be able to score +20 goals a season. Like Trezeguet did, if not then maby the player have different qualitys, and plays as a seconda punta. Del Piero diden't score +20 goals every season, but he did so much more with his vision,skills,passing. Can Matri do that? :D im doubtful. He can't even controll his first touch so im not so optimistic :D. So what is left? Goals, do he score alot? Not IMO, maby you think so.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
He isn't even featuring for the NT, 12m is a decent price for him. I doubt current Juventus would bid that much, we're in a much better position than we were the winter we bought him.
He isnt featuring in the NT, because he is not a starter, but he would have been a starter in a smaller serie A club.
Regardless, Matri was never a super player, he averaged about 10goals/season when we got and the same things stands with us, with so much competition and less playing time.
His value should not go down, when he is proven in a bigger level, on the contrary, and he is not that old, he still has 5-7 good years ahead of him.

As most of the non-selling big clubs, we sell our players for less than what we paid.
This goes since the time I started supporting Juve. We always sold our players for less than what we paid. Cases like Zidane are different. In fact, even today we can sell our stars for much more than what we paid (Vidal for example), but big teams rarely sell their stars.
Don't look at it as losing money. We won't lose money if we sell Buffon for 25m eur today, after buying him for almost 50. Juve are a big club, we use our players in their prime, and then get rid of them when we don't need them. It's normal that a 26 year old Matri was more expensive than a 29 year old Matri.
Cron, criticize where there is room for criticizing. Stick to Felipe Melo or Martinez. Here, in Matri's case, you just look foolish.
We never sold so many players in loss and released so many, since calciopoli.
At that time there were many excuses, valid or not, but now we are champions!
There should not be such excusion, we are no longer in that desperate situation, we need to turn tables on the way the market deals with us, we cannot let them take advanatge of that situation for ever!
Thats all i am asking for, i am not asking for Moggi miracles, but we really need to make an efford to improve our transfer strategy.

Do you remember how Moggi used to offload our dead wood, to get younger promising players?
How he handled the players contracts we had, creating funds out of them, without paying fortunes to get our Giovincos back?
The trades and swaps he made?

Of course you dont, we need to forget such deals, they wont happen again, we dont have such pros running our club anymore,
but we should at least try to stop all those smaller clubs to abuse us, asking insane summs for mediocre players and get ours for free!
 

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
He isnt featuring in the NT, because he is not a starter, but he would have been a starter in a smaller serie A club.
Regardless, Matri was never a super player, he averaged about 10goals/season when we got and the same things stands with us, with so much competition and less playing time.
His value should not go down, when he is proven in a bigger level, on the contrary, and he is not that old, he still has 5-7 good years ahead of him.
He's not featuring for the NT because he's not better than Osvaldo and virtually unknown to Prandelli. He's 29, maybe he got 2 or 3 years left on his best level, much better strikers than Matri declined early in their 30ties. 26 or 29 is a big difference for any player, but especially for strikers.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
So 17,5m in January for a 26yo Matri who just scored 11 goals in half a season was overpaying, but 12m in summer for 29yo Matri who scored 10 goals in full season is selling under value. How much did you value Matri back then Cron and what is his value now? In numbers? @Cronios
We never needed a 7-10goals/season forward.
I was against this transfer because he wasnt prolific enough.
But there were no other Italian options available and we had to settle for him, despite not being what we needed.
We should only settle, if he was coming at a decent price, otherwise we should have looked abroad.
But because of the ItalJuve project, we were only signing players with NT caps and thas the only reason to sign MAtri and Toni and more...

Completely unproven and not what we needed should have come in a swap deal plus some cash.
Paying 15.5 mil in cash, on top of giving a player as well, was way out of line.
What Matri did in his carrier to worth that much? When Milan got Cassano nearly for free and Fiorentina fot Rossi for 10mil?
The ammount we have spent on him was never justified.
I was very critic about it and thats why i insisted with my ItalJuve fail avatar for more than a year.
Many more such disaster followed and after our consecutive failures, we now have to suffer extra loses, from those past mistakes.

Ok we did overpaid, it is now more obvious than even, because no one who give that ammount, as we did.
But MAtri is not finished, he is still young to play at least 5 years in serie A level.
And has an extra advantgae he didnt have back then, he is now a champion, he was unproven when we got him, a wild bet, it was unsure if he would perform in a big club like Juve.
When a players proves his worthy in a higher level, he ussually doesnt lose value, on the contrary!
Matri did proved himself and he was fine overall, just not what we need tactically. It was a mistake to sign for that role, but this does not means that he is a bad player.

HOnestly, my respect for him has grown since we got him, i wouldnt mind keeping him if that means that we wont lose anyore time and resources with supporting strikers.
But our priority in my opinion still stands on the finishing department, ever since we were getting Amauri, for similar reasons, i insist on the same argument.
We need smth else that we do have, but we should not underrate our players who were never meant to be used as such.
It is not MAtri's fault that he is not a prolific finisher, he never was and it was our mistake to sign him as such.
But we should not consider him kak, just because he is not what he need, he is a good forward who can help a team of our level, in many other ways.
Some other teams may have a need for such a player.
And we are not the only team with nationalistic fans.
I believe we could have negotiated a better price if Conte was using him more, at this point, it is not a good moment to sell and i would settle with that 12mil, considering Marotta's limited negotiation skills, the misuse of the player, the current financial situation in Italy, if ti were to come from an Italian club.
Better a suitor from EPL, who could offer a salary above the player's demand could easily afford more for a player of MAtri's caliber, if we did it with Giaccherini, we can sure repeat it with Matri.
 

Fellas

Farsopoli
Jun 13, 2005
3,136
He's not featuring for the NT because he's not better than Osvaldo and virtually unknown to Prandelli. He's 29, maybe he got 2 or 3 years left on his best level, much better strikers than Matri declined early in their 30ties. 26 or 29 is a big difference for any player, but especially for strikers.
Osvaldo yes, and Gilardino,Pazzini,Balotelli,Giovinco,Di Natale,El Sharrawy,Rossi,Cassano have I missed someone? Probably Destro, Insigne to. All players Prandelli picks before Matri, Rossi and Cassano have had some injury problems, but im sure they will get their chance if they are injury free and can play with their clubs. Matri is not top 10 strikers in Italian national team but is Juventus calibre :D.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 44)