Klin

نحن الروبوتات
May 27, 2009
61,692
I had a discussion with one of my colleagues on our company forum. I said that Zidane is the best player throughout history, I know it's debatable but I simply rate him higher than Pelé and Maradona. Anyway, I ended the discussion when he said that Zidane is good but he is probably in the top 20 footballers.

Seriously now, how can you argue with a person who thinks Gordon Banks is a better footballer than Zidane?
I'm yet to see a player with more technique, elegance and balance with the ball than Zidane.

Best player of all time in my book.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,382
It's debatable between him and Maradona... I'd choose Zidane because I've watched more of him during his entire career.
Exactly the same for me but more that I prefer the style of Zidane to the style of Maradona.

And for those who asked if my colleague is English, no, he's Swedish and the Swedes suffer what the Americans do.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
As a French football supporter Zidane is one of my all time favorites, but i'm afraid he did not have the individual brilliance that Maradona had. The coke sniffing pot head is the best of all time i'm afraid.
 

JBF

اختك يا زمن
Aug 5, 2006
18,451
Exactly.


Now why didn't you say that when the debate was going on but rather took the "I haven't watched Diego enough to judge him" approach?
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
I haven't watched him enough to judge him, reruns of games, video highlights, youtube clips etc are not enough to judge a player. Which is why i don't think my opinion counts for much in this debate. The same reason i will not argue with people who were old enough to watch him play ala Alen, Jack, Serge, Greg, Deneb etc.

But from what i saw, the things Maradona did with the ball, and the individual brilliance he showed, i haven't seen any player do the things he does.


Though like i said before, i am aware that my opinion counts for little in this debate.
 

V

Senior Member
Jun 8, 2005
20,110
  • V

    V

As a French football supporter Zidane is one of my all time favorites, but i'm afraid he did not have the individual brilliance that Maradona had. The coke sniffing pot head is the best of all time i'm afraid.
Though I tend to disagree there, I get what you are saying but depends on what you prefer. Individual brilliance or brilliance to make the whole team shine? I think Zizou had both, but the latter in spades.

That time when Ronaldinho was in his heyday, I had friends who genuinely thought Maradona or Pele, even Zizou, had nothing on him. It may seem funny now, but at the time...it was a thing to think about, at least. Anyway, that's the best example for me to show why Zidane is actually the greatest footballer ever; consistency. I said, we'll see how long Dinho will be able to keep it up.

That's where Zidane stands out. The guy played at a top level for practically a decade. He had 5 amazing years in Juventus, winning 2 Scudettos(which at that time were practically more difficult to win than a CL), two lost CL finals..then he took his country to win the WC in 98, then the Euro in 2000. Then he spent 5 fantastic years in Real Madrid, where he won La Liga and CL. Then at the end of his career, he almost single-handedly took France to another WC final. I can honestly say, Zidane was the best player in the world for practically 10 full years.

Not Maradona, not Pele, had something like that. One can argue Pele did, but that was a different time and the fact he never left Brasil is something I don't appreciate. Maradona, I love him to death, he is what he is and no one can argue his genius, but he as well had his time and only went downhill.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 10)