World's newest state (6 Viewers)

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,893
#84
I think that's one of the questions being asked, because they were autonomous already so what difference is this making?
The difference is that now they are officially lost for Serbia ;)
They gained their full autonomy in 1999 after NATO bombed Serbia so the situation post 1999 and today isn't much different, with the only difference being that Serbs will no longer have any rights on Kosovo after it gets it's full independence.

I was just looking at the stance of some countries regarding this issue and it's hillarious how egoistic their stance is.

Spain doesn't want to recognize Kosovo;
Why ? Because they know Basque will ask for independence and they are in absolutely the same situation as Kosovo
(this is where we'll see double standards. I bet everything that the EU and USA won't use the same criteria in this case and they won't claim that Basque deserves to be independent.)

Tahir's Pakistan will be one of the first 3 countries that will recognize Kosovo while India won't recognize Kosovo ?
Why mr. Ze ? :p
Because there is a "minor" problem with Kashmir and the situation is exactly the same as it's with Serbia/Kosovo/Albania

The Balkan countries, except for Albania, are all against Kosovo's independence but all of them will recognize Kosovo, simply because they're told to do it.
The Serbs in Croatia can always ask for independence of the teritories where they live. The Serbs in Bosnia, Republika Srpska, have all the rights to ask independence. Albanians make 25% of the population in Macedonia. Macedonians fear they are next and they'll lose their western teritories so they'll be part of Great Albania. Greeks also have Albanians inside Greece but they have the problem with Northern Cyprus with Turkey. Northern Cyprus (inhabited with Turks) can ask for independence.

Turkey will immediately recognize Kosovo.
Why ?
Because now the Turks in northern Cyprus will have every right to ask for independence.

I don't know the English term, but what is happening with Kosovo is a ...i think the word is precedent, in international law and the consequences will be huge.
Russians are also angry. They say that whoever recognizes Kosovo will pay for that.

For all these reasons it's hard to agree with the independence, but there is another thing we mustn't forget - the Albanians in Kosovo. They are 2millions and they make more than 95% of the population of Kosovo. They simply don't want to be a part of Serbia and they, with rights, fear for their security if they are part of Serbia. They now live there for centuries and they want their own state.


Now be smart and go figure :pumpkin:
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,893
#86
Minor Balkan mess that will certainly lead to something much much bigger than this. Let me remind you that the World War I started after a minor Balkan mess :D

What i'm saying here Tahir is this: After the WW II and the terrors there the world decided not to allow something similar to happen.
That's why the UN were formed and some of their purposes, in order to prevent a new world war were :

1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

2. United Nations guarantee the sovereignty and territorial integrity of independent states within their internationally recognized borders.

We mustn't forget the Resolution on the Protection of Sovereignty. Any declaration of Kosovo’s independence as well as recognition thereof by any state, would constitute a gross violation of international law and primarily of the UN Charter, the Helsinki Final Act and Security Council Resolution 1244. Such acts and activities would directly jeopardize the sovereignty, territorial integrity and constitutional order of Serbia and of many other countries in the future.


Looks like a long time passed, most of the people who lived through the WWII terror died and we slowly forgot what was happening there and why were the UN created.
So we introduced the law of the jungle again. Now hundreds of autonomous provincies or simple provincies will ask for independence, will look at this example and try to gain their independence with guns and rockets. The great powers will find themselves in conflicts while trying to create or prevent the creation of some new countries etc.

This sucks balls
 

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
#87
Minor Balkan mess that will certainly lead to something much much bigger than this. Let me remind you that the World War I started after a minor Balkan mess :D

What i'm saying here Tahir is this: After the WW II and the terrors there the world decided not to allow something similar to happen.
That's why the UN were formed and some of their purposes, in order to prevent a new world war were :

1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

2. United Nations guarantee the sovereignty and territorial integrity of independent states within their internationally recognized borders.


Looks like a long time passed, most of the people who lived through the WWII terror died and we slowly forgot what was happening there and why were the UN created.
So we introduced the law of the jungle again. Now hundreds of autonomous provincies or simple provincies will ask for independence, will look at this example and try to gain their independence with guns and rockets. The great powers will find themselves in conflicts while trying to create or prevent the creation of some new countries etc.

This sucks balls
Right so now basically all the powerful countries are drawing up borders any way they like; in their own interest in the name of peace. There are provinces and areas within Pakistan that have been whining about it and certain countries have been providing them weapons to help their cause.

It's not just a Balkan mess, it just seems like they're the only ones for now getting the shaft :p
 

C4ISR

Senior Member
Dec 18, 2005
2,362
#88
I agree with Alen in that this news sets a precedent, and a dangerous one at that.

I find it strange that the Americans would back Kosovo, considering the situation they have with the Kurds in Iraq. Not to mention Taiwan. The Americans are hypocrites once again.
 
OP
The Arif

The Arif

Senior Member
Jan 31, 2004
12,564
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #90
    I agree with Alen in that this news sets a precedent, and a dangerous one at that.

    I find it strange that the Americans would back Kosovo, considering the situation they have with the Kurds in Iraq. Not to mention Taiwan. The Americans are hypocrites once again.
    Well, it's logical they back Kosovo because they have their biggest military base in Europe located in Kosovo, and as Alen said, Kosovo is very rich with minerals.

    This whole independece thing is not Kosovo vs Serbia, it's USA vs Russia.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,916
    #91
    The difference is that now they are officially lost for Serbia ;)
    They gained their full autonomy in 1999 after NATO bombed Serbia so the situation post 1999 and today isn't much different, with the only difference being that Serbs will no longer have any rights on Kosovo after it gets it's full independence.

    I was just looking at the stance of some countries regarding this issue and it's hillarious how egoistic their stance is.

    Spain doesn't want to recognize Kosovo;
    Why ? Because they know Basque will ask for independence and they are in absolutely the same situation as Kosovo
    (this is where we'll see double standards. I bet everything that the EU and USA won't use the same criteria in this case and they won't claim that Basque deserves to be independent.)

    Tahir's Pakistan will be one of the first 3 countries that will recognize Kosovo while India won't recognize Kosovo ?
    Why mr. Ze ? :p
    Because there is a "minor" problem with Kashmir and the situation is exactly the same as it's with Serbia/Kosovo/Albania

    The Balkan countries, except for Albania, are all against Kosovo's independence but all of them will recognize Kosovo, simply because they're told to do it.
    The Serbs in Croatia can always ask for independence of the teritories where they live. The Serbs in Bosnia, Republika Srpska, have all the rights to ask independence. Albanians make 25% of the population in Macedonia. Macedonians fear they are next and they'll lose their western teritories so they'll be part of Great Albania. Greeks also have Albanians inside Greece but they have the problem with Northern Cyprus with Turkey. Northern Cyprus (inhabited with Turks) can ask for independence.

    Turkey will immediately recognize Kosovo.
    Why ?
    Because now the Turks in northern Cyprus will have every right to ask for independence.

    I don't know the English term, but what is happening with Kosovo is a ...i think the word is precedent, in international law and the consequences will be huge.
    Russians are also angry. They say that whoever recognizes Kosovo will pay for that.

    For all these reasons it's hard to agree with the independence, but there is another thing we mustn't forget - the Albanians in Kosovo. They are 2millions and they make more than 95% of the population of Kosovo. They simply don't want to be a part of Serbia and they, with rights, fear for their security if they are part of Serbia. They now live there for centuries and they want their own state.


    Now be smart and go figure :pumpkin:

    :lol2:

    You can't help but sit back and say, "dude, this is pretty fucked up."
     

    Bisco

    Senior Member
    Nov 21, 2005
    14,418
    #92
    I agree with Alen in that this news sets a precedent, and a dangerous one at that.

    I find it strange that the Americans would back Kosovo, considering the situation they have with the Kurds in Iraq. Not to mention Taiwan. The Americans are hypocrites once again.
    Well, it's logical they back Kosovo because they have their biggest military base in Europe located in Kosovo, and as Alen said, Kosovo is very rich with minerals.

    This whole independece thing is not Kosovo vs Serbia, it's USA vs Russia.
    first of all congrats arif, i hope that this the begining of new things to yr country and people. as for the serbians i guess its for there best intentions too, i knew about kosovo getting there independence a week from this as gio has told me recently that it looks like kosovo are heading for independence. i think its best for every one bec lets face it serbia is still suffereing till this day from the cost of the wars it has lead its self in. regardless of cause or aim for such a war but it has def suffered heavily in all aspects. i think its time now for the serbs to build up for the future of there upcoming generations. they need to do this for the sake of civilians.

    as for the united states involvement well i have recently watched a programme about the balkans and just like the middle east it has its strategic importance to the united states.
    its well known the balkans are near important sources of oil, and most importantly the balkans are near russia and china. china in specific is the upcoming super power in the next 10 years and the united stats feels that it has to insure its prescence in this region before the chinese get to there prime. the balkan countries are a diverese collection of different ethinic grouips does the usa care about this? i personally dont think they do, lets be realisitc every country in the world looks for the best for there intentions in other words each country looks for the best possible solutions for its own benefit.


    with the kurds, at some point they were of benefit to the united states in particular during the 1990 gulf war but the united states soon found out it will cause them trouble with other countries in the region and that there were easier ways to acheive there needs other than getting involved with the kurds hence now no one talks or even protests when the kurds are mistreated.

    i dont mean to offend any one by this post i am just clearing this out for u guys and once again its just a personal opinion and feel free to doubt me or even correct me if iam wrong. this post is by no means directed to any memeber at all.
     

    X Æ A-12

    Senior Member
    Contributor
    Sep 4, 2006
    87,934
    #94
    As a Croat someone may say i'm not neutral but Dule knows me and he knows i'm neutral regarding this issue.

    Fine :

    Kosovo was Serbian land, or better - inhabited by Serbs, since the time Serbs migrated to the Balkans (5th-6th century). Kosovo is the first Serbian independent teritory where the Serbs formed their kingdom.
    It was almost 100% inhabited by Serbs.

    Then the Turks came to the Balkans and just like most of the Balkan, Kosovo became a part of the Ottoman Empire. (14th century)

    But in 1690 the Serbs rebelled against the Turks and in order to prevent his people from being massacred the patriarch Arseniye with 90 000 Serbs migrated to the North.
    Since not more than 200 000 people lived in Kosovo and since half of the population was gone, the Turks started inhabiting muslims there, namely Albanians who never lived in Kosovo before this.
    Now there were still more Serbs than Albanians but as times passed the Albanians became a majority and in 20th century they were around 70-80% of the population there.

    When Serbia was bombed in 1999 and NATO and USA sent their soldiers to Kosovo and many Serbs had to leave the teritorry, Albanians became a huge majority there.

    Now they got independence, even though it must be said that this brakes every single international law because Kosovo is recognized as part of Serbia in the UN and everywhere else.

    Now, if Kosovo gets independence, Basque can also ask for independence from Spain because it's the same case. Some Italian northern provinces can also ask independence from Italy. Northern Ireland can ask independence from England (Britain) and in some 30 years if the Mexicans become a majority in New Mexico they can freely ask for independence and use Kosovo as an example.

    It's a very tricky situation. Kosovo is a huge part of Serbian history. Their kings were born and ruled from there. The greatest battle in their history took place there.

    Kosovo is very (VERY !!) rich with minerals and other mines. the USA couldn't control this if Kosovo was Serbian because Serbia is Russia's historical partner. Now the USA controls this.
    Also, we get another Israel in the Balkans this way.

    In other words, the situation is similar to Israel just that Serbians and the other Christian neighbours are in the skin of the Middle East Arabs while Albanians are the Jews.
    And how does Serbia losing power over Kosovo mean that America automatically controls it's wealth? It sounds to me like another stupid way to blame all of their problems on Americans. I understand why Dule is mad this sounds to me like a load of bullshit being pulled by the Kosovo inhabitants.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,916
    #95
    And how does Serbia losing power over Kosovo mean that America automatically controls it's wealth? It sounds to me like another stupid way to blame all of their problems on Americans. I understand why Dule is mad this sounds to me like a load of bullshit being pulled by the Kosovo inhabitants.
    You've got a lot of eye-opening to do.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,916
    #97
    ßöмßäяdîëя;1566983 said:
    I'm not even getting into this shit....no matter how you look at it, it's biased.
    Indeed, but one thing is for sure... Russia and the US have no right to partake in Balkan dealings. But of course we'll partake in anything we want to.

    Dummy-boy above probably doesn't know where Serbia is to begin with, so what does he care.
     
    Mar 24, 2006
    13,949
    I saw it on the newspaper this morning , Actually this just way too complicated just like the Taiwan and China Mainland Case , and I don't have any worthiness to get into this so Congrats to Kosovars and so sorry to they didn't wanted it . :pint:

    I will better just be a good reader here , btw very2 Interesting explanation Alen :toast:

    Keep it Cool , debaters :agree:
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)