Without Religion, would homosexuals be more accepted? (21 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
rounder

rounder

Blindman
#123
Jun 13, 2007
7,233
#123
Zé Tahir said:
You conveniently chose to ignore the latter part of my post and my other post in here.

The only difference between heterosexuals, homosexuals, necrophiliacs, and pedophiles is that heterosexuals and homosexuals have the convenience of being 'themselves' because they can find other consenting adults. There is no medical proof (yet) that people are born one way or another. The only issue with pedophiles and necrophiliacs is that they desire something immoral and illegal in nearly all societies, however if these people could control their desires then why not accept them into society? Why should they continue to be stigmatized? After all they might be born that way if you argue that homosexuals and heterosexuals are.

Kleptomaniacs are a medically recognized group and so long as their not stealing shit (which is considered wrong and illegal everywhere) no one hates them. Why hate on 'passive' if you will, pedophiles and necrophiliacs then?
Click to expand...
I think you make a good point.

I wouldn't say there is any good reason to hate on pedophiles and necrophiliacs if they did not harm other people in society. And if they were born that way I think it's even admirable that they prevent themselves from fulfilling their desires.
 
Ford Prefect

Ford Prefect

Senior Member
#124
May 28, 2009
10,557
#124
The reason we cannot accept paedophiles into society (although it is a problem that has been blown out of proportion to a ridiculous extent) is because sexual relations require consent from both parties otherwise it is rape. A child cannot consent to a sexual relationship because they do not have the mental or physical maturity to either understand or partake in the activities. If the person claims to be able to control their 'nature' then it isn't a problem untill they are deemed a threat to someone that cannot consent. There are paedophiles that live in society and never have any intention of part taking in sexual relations with a minor and no one would ever know there were such urges.
 
Raz

Raz

Senior Member
#125
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
#125
ja5per said:
The reason we cannot accept paedophiles into society (although it is a problem that has been blown out of proportion to a ridiculous extent) is because sexual relations require consent from both parties otherwise it is rape. A child cannot consent to a sexual relationship because they do not have the mental or physical maturity to either understand or partake in the activities. If the person claims to be able to control their 'nature' then it isn't a problem untill they are deemed a threat to someone that cannot consent. There are paedophiles that live in society and never have any intention of part taking in sexual relations with a minor and no one would ever know there were such urges.
Click to expand...
Very well said :tup:
 
Enron

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
#127
Oct 11, 2005
75,659
#127
Pretty much the same reason we can't accept sociopathic murderers that kill people even though it is their nature and they don't really have control over their impulses. The basis is pretty much "which of these groups is a physical danger to society".
 
Bozi

Bozi

The Bozman
Administrator
#128
Oct 18, 2005
22,747
#128
Aaron said:
Pretty much the same reason we can't accept sociopathic murderers that kill people even though it is their nature and they don't really have control over their impulses. The basis is pretty much "which of these groups is a physical danger to society".
Click to expand...
lets be honest lets all focus our attention to the real physical danger to society,AHKKKmedios and his Anal Cannon,thsi man and his cavernous anus poses a threat to almost the whole eastern seaboard and he is well within range of almost the whole of northern Europe. for too long this man has held power over us,threats of flying faeces over Sweeden,Britain,Holland and his alliance with the French (who surrendered after receiving an envelope of weapons grade crap) have had us all terrified....if the UN refuse to react,i say we UNITE....lets stand against this tyranny...lets force Akmedios back into the cesspool from which he emerged...
 
OP
Bjerknes

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Thread Starter #129
Mar 16, 2004
115,946
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #129
    Bozi said:
    lets be honest lets all focus our attention to the real physical danger to society,AHKKKmedios and his Anal Cannon,thsi man and his cavernous anus poses a threat to almost the whole eastern seaboard and he is well within range of almost the whole of northern Europe. for too long this man has held power over us,threats of flying faeces over Sweeden,Britain,Holland and his alliance with the French (who surrendered after receiving an envelope of weapons grade crap) have had us all terrified....if the UN refuse to react,i say we UNITE....lets stand against this tyranny...lets force Akmedios back into the cesspool from which he emerged...
    Click to expand...
    Agreed. Akkkhmedios once wiped out an entire brigade of IDF soldiers with his cannon.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6498835.stm
     
    Bozi

    Bozi

    The Bozman
    Administrator
    #132
    Oct 18, 2005
    22,747
    #132
    though it seems my intel was wrong,it appears that the French surrendered when someone farted on a train
     
    Dragon

    Dragon

    Senior Member
    #133
    Apr 24, 2003
    27,407
    #133
    I'm gonna go out for beers tonight with one of my gay friends. I wanna ask him the stuff we've debated here but I'm not sure how he'll react
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Thread Starter #134
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,946
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #134
    Ask him if he's into really gay Jordanians who like Juve, because he could find one here.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 21)