Wishlist and General Juve winter mercato talk (2013-14) (31 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Status
Dude, you're worse than Sheik in this regard and I thought it wasn't possible. 
But on a serious note, I get your point, I am pro sacrificing defense only when the offensive aspect outweighs it and vice-verse.
That's why I don't understand why do we need 3 CBs when one of them (usually Chiellini) with no attacking capability at all spends like 90% of the time in opponents final third, thus contributing nothing in offense nor defense. That's like putting Gio as a DM.
At the risk of sounding like a uneducated football peasant, can you explain it?
But on a serious note, I get your point, I am pro sacrificing defense only when the offensive aspect outweighs it and vice-verse.
That's why I don't understand why do we need 3 CBs when one of them (usually Chiellini) with no attacking capability at all spends like 90% of the time in opponents final third, thus contributing nothing in offense nor defense. That's like putting Gio as a DM.
At the risk of sounding like a uneducated football peasant, can you explain it?
Dude, you're worse than Sheik in this regard and I thought it wasn't possible.
But on a serious note, I get your point, I am pro sacrificing defense only when the offensive aspect outweighs it and vice-verse.
That's why I don't understand why do we need 3 CBs when one of them (usually Chiellini) with no attacking capability at all spends like 90% of the time in opponents final third, thus contributing nothing in offense nor defense. That's like putting Gio as a DM.
At the risk of sounding like a uneducated football peasant, can you explain it?
But on a serious note, I get your point, I am pro sacrificing defense only when the offensive aspect outweighs it and vice-verse.
That's why I don't understand why do we need 3 CBs when one of them (usually Chiellini) with no attacking capability at all spends like 90% of the time in opponents final third, thus contributing nothing in offense nor defense. That's like putting Gio as a DM.
At the risk of sounding like a uneducated football peasant, can you explain it?
On a serious note, its because Conte wants to play 433
On a less serious note :
Chiellini is good at anticipating, heading and putting pressure. moving him forward is a tactical move in wich he'll fight for the off balls. Its pretty hard against a fast mobile anticipating tackeling jumping heading and duelpower player to win those offbals.
Basically, you are confining the opponent and eliminating much of the counters. In a way, its filling up the abscence of marchisio in a diffrent way
But you can disregard that. I'm sure conte does it cause he wants to show marotta he needs wingers
- - - Updated - - -
Farts are excellent. but you can only stand your own
Dude, you're worse than Sheik in this regard and I thought it wasn't possible.
But on a serious note, I get your point, I am pro sacrificing defense only when the offensive aspect outweighs it and vice-verse.
That's why I don't understand why do we need 3 CBs when one of them (usually Chiellini) with no attacking capability at all spends like 90% of the time in opponents final third, thus contributing nothing in offense nor defense. That's like putting Gio as a DM.
At the risk of sounding like a uneducated football peasant, can you explain it?
But on a serious note, I get your point, I am pro sacrificing defense only when the offensive aspect outweighs it and vice-verse.
That's why I don't understand why do we need 3 CBs when one of them (usually Chiellini) with no attacking capability at all spends like 90% of the time in opponents final third, thus contributing nothing in offense nor defense. That's like putting Gio as a DM.
At the risk of sounding like a uneducated football peasant, can you explain it?
- Status