Winter Mercato 2015 (32 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
DUKAC

DUKAC

Senior Member
#4,583
Feb 29, 2012
12,292
#4,583
I would like Shaquiri most .I really think that he is very good,young and can contribute a lot to this Juve team.The thing is that Bayern doesn't need money so they will put at least a 20 mil price tag for him.Anyway,maybe some won't agree with me but ,even they aren't playing on the same position,Roma payed a massive 32 mil for Iturbe for warming their bench.In my opinion Shaquiri is way better player than him and we just need him.But,at the end of the day even we got 48 mil for CL qualification Beppe won't give 20 mil for him.No way.
 
GordoDeCentral

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
#4,584
Apr 14, 2005
70,865
#4,584
Fred said:
Its a meaningless list. No one person has the ability to compare all those players over a 60 -70 year period. One thing I can tell you for sure is that Theirry was one of the best players in the Premiership, the fact that you have Tony Adams, Roy Keane and Giggs on that list and Henry is not there, is questionable. I mean I can understand a legend like Giggs, even though he didn't reach heights Henry did between 2002-2006 in terms of individual performance, but Keane and Adams better than Henry?

Silly list like all other lists that compare thousands of players over such a long time period.

- - - Updated - - -





Oh and one other thing X, I love Roman, he was a player that represented a dying breed, I used to watch Villareal every week back when he was there. But to say he was better than Xavi is nothing short of laughable, I mean maybe you could say he had the potential and talent to be better(albeit unfulfilled) but if we're comparing players in terms of performance levels, consistency and results? even Roman will tell you he only wishes to have half the career Xavi had. When I say that I don't mean in terms of trophies won, because then even Pique can claim to be better than Cannavaro, but I mean in terms of individual performance and contribution to those trophies, for a long time Xavi was the barometer for midfielders in Europe, the guy was consistently one of the best in his position for 5-6 years.
Click to expand...
the list is just fine, henry is the di natale of arsenal9holla at your boy @PostIronic)

also regarding roman:

' Avec un ratio de 0,33 passe décisive par match (181 passes pour 550 matchs), Roman devance Dani Alves (avec 137 passes pour 466 matchs), Ronnie, Fàbregas, Lampard, Xavi, Messi, Beckham et Cristiano Ronaldo. Comme quoi, le football n'est pas encore tout à fait mort. '
 
Vlad

Vlad

In Allegri We Trust
#4,585
May 23, 2011
24,064
#4,585
I wouldn't put Henry anywhere near the all time greats. He was often underwhelming for French NT, failing to make an impact on the biggest stage. His handball vs Northern Ireland was probably the pinnacle of his NT career, when it comes to individual contribution.

PostIronic said:
That list places Bergkamp in the top 15 of all time. Retarded. :p
Click to expand...
There's no two ways about it, Berkamp in his prime was better footballer than Henry. Leader on the pitch, both for his NT and Arsenal.
 

napoleonic

Senior Member
#4,587
Sep 7, 2010
4,129
#4,587
X said:
i agree thats the only one i have problem with, though redondo was truly a joy to watch
Click to expand...
I don't even remember who redondo was lmao, if anything hierro or even morientes were arguably had more impact than redondo, heck even mijatovic

If anything, the likes of cannavaro, maldini, baresi or even lev yashin were more worthy being on that rank than freaking redondo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 31)