Who was the man of the match? Ratings? (13 Viewers)

[Marty]

We've talked about this a while ago but the idea was never implented. So I took some time to setup this.

Like we talked about before, an unbiased jury (is there such a thing? ) would cast their vote on who they thought was man of the match, and the poll would be created together with the match report shortly after the game has ended. Only people selected for this jury will see the poll and are able to vote for their choice. The results could be presented say 24 hours after the poll was started (and ended).

Ideas? How about a complete rating system where each member of the jury can give ratings for each player? The problem with a full rating system is that polls can't be used (too many options - think 14 players each with a rating 1-10). I think the key here is to make this system as easy and automated as possible.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Lawnchair Bes]

sounds gay. why not have everybody vote?

 

[Marty]

To not create biased results, let me dig up the thread. Here:

http://www.juventuz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=13544

 

[Rami]

Actually Marty, originally the idea was not only MOM, but rating all the players in the usual 0-10 system. I don't know what is possible and what is not, but isn't it possible to have something like in questionannairs? In front of each player 10 radio buttons, with 0 on the left and 10 on the right. Or even do it manually in front of each player a space for a number....

 

[Marty]

Actually Marty, originally the idea was not only MOM, but rating all the players in the usual 0-10 system. I don't know what is possible and what is not, but isn't it possible to have something like in questionannairs? In front of each player 10 radio buttons, with 0 on the left and 10 on the right. Or even do it manually in front of each player a space for a number....

Yeah I know, read the first post fully.

 

[Rami]

I did and I was suggesting the mechanism, what I meant is maybe polls isnt the way to go...

 

[Marty]

I did and I was suggesting the mechanism, what I meant is maybe polls isnt the way to go...

I hear ya. Yeah the polls thing isn't working at all for ratings, only if we do man of the match.

I have one idea for ratings that I'm working on right now, will let you know if it works out.

 

[Rami]

Weave your magic bro...weave

 

[Hambon]

great Idea marty....love it...

 

[swag]

Marty --

I really like this idea. And we can always start out simple -- just a singular vote -- and as needed/time allows, move on to a more sophisticated rating system.

 

[flieeeekke]

sounds gay. why not have everybody vote?

because 80% of people dont get to see the matches and they'd still vote against zlatan or del piero..

 

[flieeeekke]

just one question. who are in the jury?

 

[Marty]

No jury yet

 

[flieeeekke]

int:

 

[Respaul]

No jury yet

lol

 

[Marty]

Well I need to get it working first

 

[Marty]

OK I've setup a survey kind of system where people can vote on each Juventus player who participated in the game. Once people have voted we can export the results and make a nice little graph of it, please note that the numbers here are completely random and noone's taken the survey yet (well I've already tested it of course and it works ) and that the graph is no good.

Anyone with good Excel graphing skills who can make a nice template for us?

 

[Respaul]

Thats quite cool... Would be good if you had 2 graphs... one for the match in question and one overall rating

 

[Marty]

Yeah could do that, would just have to keep all the stats in an excel book.

 

[Bjerknes]

Good stuff, Marty. Glad to see this idea has not been forgotten.