True, but the Judge here isn't being victimized here. It's the criminal who is. He's the one who's going to get the punishment, so that's really the point I'm trying to make. Is it really fair to the criminal if he had no other alternative?
Is it fair to the hydrogen atom that it was bound in an H2O compound that it now can't get out of? Does the question make any sense?
If the oxygen atom had no choice but to bond with the hydrogen atom then where does fairness enter into it? The concept of fairness presupposes that the outcome could have been different.
I'm the 4th generation, and my nephew will and child (when we finally have one) , will be the 5th generation. This team has been one of the very few constants in my family history, and I'm not dropping the ball on this