[WC] World Cup 2010 - General Talk Thread (19 Viewers)

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,026
Pazzini sucks but Italy need a finisher up there and he is better than Miccoli when it comes to that. Pazzini and Cassano pair was a proven one. Lippi shouldn't have ignored it so easily like that.
Miccoli would run and offer more outside of box. Don't think like Italians Hoori..."we need a poacher". No, they don't. Balotelli is not a retard and he could bang in goals easily...Cassano too.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,026
Juventino[RUS];2546781 said:
Marchisio e Montolivo can't play together in midfield, pepe must play on lm, camo on rm, de rossi - markiz centre, attack di natale + anybody , why lippi can't play like dat??And of cuz, REMOVE CANNAVARO FROM THE SQUAD DAMN
Wait, you're 22yo?
 

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
Marceℓℓo;2546793 said:
I sure as hell hope so.I don't see Italy losing either,but everything is possible.I really liked Montolivo BTW.
Yea he was much better than what I expected of him. I noticed in the post-game statistics that he had run more than everyone else in the Azzurri squad.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,090
Why should he always play? Because he played with him in Samp?

Pazzini sucks, Miccoli would offer more.
Cause its stupid to play 3 supporting strikers and if anybody of the Italian strikers should play then Pazzini would be the choice cause already has a great chemistry with Cassano.
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
Marceℓℓo;2546793 said:
I really liked Montolivo BTW.
People will criticise him for starting in CM ahead of Marchisio or whatever but he's been good in the last two games and someone like that on the ball is needed in the absence of Pirlo. Really calm and composed.
 

Mohad

The Ocean Star
May 20, 2009
6,696
Great result for NZ. It was a brave defensive performance, but that's going a little overboard. They scored on their only shot on goal, and that one was probably offside. :lol:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 19)