How exactly has he been poor but Amauri hasn't? IQ has scored twice in two games (almost 3) up until yesterday and he still looked good. At least his shots are on target and potentially lethal.
It is annoying that people won't give him the benefit of the doubt after being injured for so long yet instantly people love to find excuses for Amauri. Why is that?
How exactly has he been poor but Amauri hasn't? IQ has scored twice in two games (almost 3) up until yesterday and he still looked good. At least his shots are on target and potentially lethal.
How exactly has he been poor but Amauri hasn't? IQ has scored twice in two games (almost 3) up until yesterday and he still looked good. At least his shots are on target and potentially lethal.
It is annoying that people won't give him the benefit of the doubt after being injured for so long yet instantly people love to find excuses for Amauri. Why is that?
His shots are definitely lethal. He could have killed that poor goalie with that headshot. It's sad that people prefer him over Amauri just because Amauri has shitty long hair and a poor on field attitude.
How exactly has he been poor but Amauri hasn't? IQ has scored twice in two games (almost 3) up until yesterday and he still looked good. At least his shots are on target and potentially lethal.
It is annoying that people won't give him the benefit of the doubt after being injured for so long yet instantly people love to find excuses for Amauri. Why is that?
Keyword here ladies, potentially. 2 goals, almost 3 in 2 games is better than a bunch of almost "on targets" from the other guy that gets defended for coming back from injury...blah blah blah.
Keyword, again, potentially. Did our other striker playing yesterday have a shot on target or get himself in a position to even shoot?