I'm afraid we're past the point where facts matter. It seems that the electorate public need emotional reactions to soundbytes, and any facts are the casualty of political war. No one has the patience for them anymore.
They need whatever the media teaches them to "need", what forms their political culture. It just so happens that emotion is basically all these campaigns are about these days.
I'm afraid we're past the point where facts matter. It seems that the electorate public need emotional reactions to soundbytes, and any facts are the casualty of political war. No one has the patience for them anymore.
I'm afraid we're past the point where facts matter. It seems that the electorate public need emotional reactions to soundbytes, and any facts are the casualty of political war. No one has the patience for them anymore.
He's shown to be a hypocrite. Not to mention he's fabricated facts just to make the opposition look worse. I'm cooking right now so I can't google it but yeah.
---------- Post added 04.09.2012 at 17:01 ----------
Good point. Big companies need to get their shit checked too. I don't think Hustini has anything against that though.
~I'm not against that. I think a lot of big companies find loopholes in the system, as do small ones. I think regulations are important to ensure CEOs are running a tight ship.
I don't see it getting better. Right now you have two parties that thrive on the echo chambers of their own self-love, celebrating in the fiction of belief unrooted from truth.
And elections are about emotions, not rational logic. Nobody gets out of their chair and riled up to vote because it seems like the most calculated answer. They do it because the preacher makes them believe -- even if what they believe is pure b.s.
I'm afraid we're past the point where facts matter. It seems that the electorate public need emotional reactions to soundbytes, and any facts are the casualty of political war. No one has the patience for them anymore.
They need whatever the media teaches them to "need", what forms their political culture. It just so happens that emotion is basically all these campaigns are about these days.
I don't see it getting better. Right now you have two parties that thrive on the echo chambers of their own self-love, celebrating in the fiction of belief unrooted from truth.
And elections are about emotions, not rational logic. Nobody gets out of their chair and riled up to vote because it seems like the most calculated answer. They do it because the preacher makes them believe -- even if what they believe is pure b.s.
But that doesn't mean the population "is so dumb that this is the only thing they will listen to" or similar rationales. It's no secret that people are generally lazy, but they are a product of the society they live in.
I don't see it getting better. Right now you have two parties that thrive on the echo chambers of their own self-love, celebrating in the fiction of belief unrooted from truth.
And elections are about emotions, not rational logic. Nobody gets out of their chair and riled up to vote because it seems like the most calculated answer. They do it because the preacher makes them believe -- even if what they believe is pure b.s.
But that doesn't mean the population "is so dumb that this is the only thing they will listen to" or similar rationales. It's no secret that people are generally lazy, but they are a product of the society they live in.
They are lazy in they don't research the "why" anymore. I have my views as do all of you, but I at least make an effort to do my own research as best as I can. I don't watch TV...no CNN or Fox or NBC or CSPAN, I prefer to read and draw my own conclusions.
It can - in the long run - become a democratic problem, if we are more interested in the sexual orientation of a politician than what he/she actually believes is the right solution for a given problem.
Just look at how little we talk about The European Union simply because it's not a 'sexy' subject.
It can - in the long run - become a democratic problem, if we are more interested in the sexual orientation of a politician than what he/she actually believes is the right solution for a given problem.
Just look at how little we talk about The European Union simply because it's not a 'sexy' subject.
It's only marketable if you're a hater. Seems to me negative politics are far more interesting to people lately than positive things. I hate this vs I like this.
They are lazy in they don't research the "why" anymore. I have my views as do all of you, but I at least make an effort to do my own research as best as I can. I don't watch TV...no CNN or Fox or NBC or CSPAN, I prefer to read and draw my own conclusions.
It's only marketable if you're a hater. Seems to me negative politics are far more interesting to people lately than positive things. I hate this vs I like this.
It can - in the long run - become a democratic problem, if we are more interested in the sexual orientation of a politician than what he/she actually believes is the right solution for a given problem.
Just look at how little we talk about The European Union simply because it's not a 'sexy' subject.
Seriously, fuck The Nihilistic People's party. A bunch of spoiled hipster brats trying to be cool. My favorite thing in the world is when I find a proclaimed nihilist at a party, the moron rate on those are 100%.
---------- Post added 04.09.2012 at 23:37 ----------
I agree. I left Socialistic People's Party after a certain bill wasn't passed here and I quite frankly hope the party is consumed into a black hole of what once was. (not that this makes alot of sense to you, since I doubt you follow DK politics, but the example is supposed to back up your point)