US Presidential Elections 2012 (9 Viewers)

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,031
Everywhere in the world it's plausible to choose the lesser of two evils. Even if nothing considerably changes in the short term, it can make way for bigger changes in the future.

As for Obama, it's only Americans who can decide but one would never know what would have happened if McCain had been elected instead.
Presidential talks mean nothing, though. "We'll do this" is all bullshit. I don't think anyone will change the current situation, whoever gets elected, it can only get worse.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,278
Everywhere in the world it's plausible to choose the lesser of two evils. Even if nothing considerably changes in the short term, it can make way for bigger changes in the future.

As for Obama, it's only Americans who can decide but one would never know what would have happened if McCain had been elected instead.
This post is exactly what is wrong with this nation. Thank you for putting it so eloquently.
 

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
This post is exactly what is wrong with this nation. Thank you for putting it so eloquently.
What part of my post are you talking about? If it's not possible to choose the lesser of two evils in this case, what's the alternative for you? To not vote at all? What is it going to change and in what way would it be beneficial? One of the two evils will be elected regardless of your participation. If that's your stance, well it's exactly what is wrong with my nation. And since what's wrong with my nation is more critical than what's wrong with your nation, I win.

Unless you clearly know what would have happened if McCain had been elected which I'm really interested to know how.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,667
I think he's referring to the assumption that a McCain presidency would have had a different result. It very likely would have been similar (except on social issues) due to all the influences on our current economic and political system.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,799
I think he's referring to the assumption that a McCain presidency would have had a different result. It very likely would have been similar (except on social issues) due to all the influences on our current economic and political system.
I kind of agree with that premise. Same circus, different clown.

It's natural to feel like your vote makes a major difference, though. Entire political campaigns are created on the emotional premise that your choices are redemption or certain death.

We humans like to believe singular events determine everything. Hell, this is why you get people whining that because of a penalty awarded in the 64th minute, the entire outcome of a match was somehow preordained. :andyandbarcelona:
 

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
I think he's referring to the assumption that a McCain presidency would have had a different result. It very likely would have been similar (except on social issues) due to all the influences on our current economic and political system.
Where did I imply that? My post was in response to Dusan who said nothing changed for better during the presidency of Obama, and as I said, one could never know if things would have been any different under McCain. Still, there are indicators based on which you can decide which of the two options is worse. Even if the outcomes wouldn't be remarkably different, small changes can still influence people's lives and also make way for bigger changes in the future.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,667
Where did I imply that? My post was in response to Dusan who said nothing changed for better during the presidency of Obama, and as I said, one could never know if things would have been any different under McCain. Still, there are indicators based on which you can decide which of the two options is worse. Even if the outcomes wouldn't be remarkably different, small changes can still influence people's lives and also make way for bigger changes in the future.
Sure, that's a possibility.
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
88,002
What part of my post are you talking about? If it's not possible to choose the lesser of two evils in this case, what's the alternative for you? To not vote at all? What is it going to change and in what way would it be beneficial? One of the two evils will be elected regardless of your participation. If that's your stance, well it's exactly what is wrong with my nation. And since what's wrong with my nation is more critical than what's wrong with your nation, I win.

Unless you clearly know what would have happened if McCain had been elected which I'm really interested to know how.
Fuck that shit, nobody should vote Democrat or Republican simply because one of those two parties will win. That's a shit reason and anyone with a brain should vote third party or not at all.

The two party system has done nothing to deserve my support or participation.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 8)