++ [ originally posted by Erik ] ++
I don't entirely agree with what you said on the EP and the EC but my experience with them is only limited. From what I've seen, EP members tend to stick to their party ideals more whereas commission members tend to think very hard about their nation's national interests before they suggest a new policy.
But like I said, I don't monitor them very closely and my impression could be false.
As for Schengen: I don't see why it would be hipocritic to make the Turks wait even longer on entering that treaty: it's not like Schengen existed back when the EU was founded. The West waited to take such drastic measures too.
I don't entirely agree with what you said on the EP and the EC but my experience with them is only limited. From what I've seen, EP members tend to stick to their party ideals more whereas commission members tend to think very hard about their nation's national interests before they suggest a new policy.
But like I said, I don't monitor them very closely and my impression could be false.
As for Schengen: I don't see why it would be hipocritic to make the Turks wait even longer on entering that treaty: it's not like Schengen existed back when the EU was founded. The West waited to take such drastic measures too.
Regarding the Commission : while it can be interesting for a determined country to have his commissioner in a certain position, the commissioners are expected to be super partes, and unlike the MEP’s they don’t have any allegiance to their national government. For better and for worse, they are first and foremost the ones who govern the EU.
