The Super League (26 Viewers)

in favour of Super League?


  • Total voters
    129
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,170
And you think up to this point man u catered to those fans? You think they became a mutli billion dollar company thanks to them? What "triggers" a reaction is that marcus rashford is a poser, he's a mini kaepernick wannabe, he will talk the talk but won't actually make any real sacrifice to walk the walk. Let him donate all his 'dirty' money and go play for millwall, otherwise it's just posing and he deserves all the flak that gets him.
Yuppers! :clap:
 

kappa96

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2018
7,470
But they all dream of a rich billionaire to bankroll their football club. I remember how some Newcastle fans were disappointed when the Saudi's backed out. No one here is taking a moral or ethical stand. There is hypocrisy everywhere.
Actually I read on the Man Utd forum that the big six vetoed the takeover, because of their interests.
 
OP
Snobist

Snobist

DareDevil
Apr 16, 2017
13,287
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,948
    What I’ve been seeing from the last 100 pages is basically this; “things are bad for the smaller clubs as it stands so why not go ahead and make things worse for them”. I mean fucking Perez using covid as an excuse to do this as if it hasn’t affected the smaller guys twice as hard.
    How much money has Crotone gotten from Uefa in last 20 years. (Nothing). What esl doing is getting rid of uefa. Nothing to do with small teams.
     

    Osman

    Koul Khara!
    Aug 30, 2002
    61,502
    But they all dream of a rich billionaire to bankroll their football club. I remember how some Newcastle fans were disappointed when the Saudi's backed out. No one here is taking a moral or ethical stand. There is hypocrisy everywhere.

    Duh, no one said its about fairness, they just dont want an alien and weird system thats only unique and acceptable in american sports. They just want the best for their teams, leagues and nations. Nothing else.
     

    Osman

    Koul Khara!
    Aug 30, 2002
    61,502
    The real reason they backed out was over some broadcasting deal fiasco

    The Qatari who run the broadcasting rights for alot of gobal football sports, did not like a Saudi state conglomerate being legimitized by owning an EPL club, when the same Saudis are undermining Qataris tv sports rights, by directly using and promoting pirate tv in Saudi arabia (and close by ally nations), directly to hurt the bottom line of the Qatar tv broadcasts. It was basically a regional power play, and Qatar won out in pressurring the right points to stop it, because they are sponsoring and enriching the right hands.


    Juventus was actually directly effected by this too, remember when we played in Saudi Arabia for super cup? They threatened Serie A/FIGC and us with less money&revoking sponsors, for going to Saudi arabia for the game, when they in outright conflict about the tv rights they own etc.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 21)