The official player numbers thread (2 Viewers)

Rollie

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2008
5,143
Sorry for the length; I felt obliged to defend my position... and no, I don't expect anyone to read the whole thing...

So you knew what 88 stood for, yet you still wore it?

Now that IS interesting.
:sergio:

I find it incredibly amusing that you probably consider yours to be a significant response.

As I have posted before, I wore 88 because 8 is my favorite number.

However, as a Wideout, 8 is not a traditional number. At the time the #80 was taken by a senior, and Marvin Harrison wore 88, so I snagged it. I'm an old school 49ers/Jerry Rice fan (hence my love for number #80), but Marvin was class back in the day, too.

Oh yeah, I wore 88. That's really something to think about... really interesting…

That number has held so much racially based significance for me, and I'm such a racist bastard, that my last roommate was Jewish, and my current roommate is black. I'm just a terrible, callous, ignorant, racist pig.

Nice attempted deflection Seven, but the reality is that you're the bigot and borderline (+) racist here, not I. That's been demonstrated frequently enough in these forums.

I certainly won't be continuing any 'conversations' with you in the future. It's not worth the energy.

One can not simply ignore the significance of symbols to others, thereby offending many and celerbrating the few, just by saying that symbol means something else to me.
Bianconero, I understand your point, and I generally agree with the sentiment behind your comment – people need to make an attempt to understand, and take into consideration the feelings of others, especially in highly sensitive matters such as the one we’re now discussing. Of course, there's an extent to everything. Flaunting symbols that are painful to others is not something that I would typically practice, recommend, or condone. I'm a compassionate and understanding individual (at least I strive to be), and I treat those around me with respect.

However, I do not operate by absolutes; I find the fact that athletes wear the number 88 to be totally acceptable, provided that there is no obvious, known connection to Neo-Nazism.

As far as 88 goes, well, for me it's mostly just a fucking number. It's had many, MANY different meanings attributed to it prior to some douchebag Neo-Nazi's prescribing their own twisted value to it, and it will have many more meanings, across a variety of cultures, attributed to it as time continues.

While I accept and respect that people may have sensitivities about this subject, from a personal standpoint I refuse to simply 'give' this number to the Neo-Nazi cause - so to speak. Fuck those pathetic, degenerate, racist cunts.

Furthermore, when the general public continually references that attributed meaning to the #88, especially in completely unrelated situations such as this, Neo-Nazis end up getting exactly what they desire; a reminder of their notoriety, publicity, any type of recognition - their name on your lips.

I do not EVER look at an athlete wearing the number 88 and think of the player, or that number, in a racialist context. I just don't, and I do not intend on starting such a personal trend now. I do not believe that prescribed Neo-Nazi value for the #88 has any place in athletics.

Now one could say that's because I’m a white, a middle class male, because I haven’t been personally attacked by Neo-Nazis (or been the subject of considerable racism), because of my country of origin, or relative geographic location, etc., etc; say whatever you like. I have my own personal rationale, and circumstances are simply what they are.

I do not care to make deluded linkages between two subjects that are not fundamentally intertwined. Racism is far from a necessary, or desirable component of athletics, and I choose to leave that variable out of the sporting equation, whenever it is not readily apparent.

You can inject an overly simplified, and hyper-politically correct statement into this equation if you like; far more often than not, the statement that you provided would represent the 'morally correct,’ or sensible thing to do. Like most dogmas, it contains a degree of social value, and I can certainly appreciate that.

I simply don't believe in absolutes.

Anyway, education AND communication are of paramount importance when considering topics such as these.

Just because something has been given a definition by one group, does not automatically, or necessarily mean that I accept that prescribed meaning as being THE meaning, or having significance relevant to the situation (given the context of this particular example).

I would never agree with someone walking around Europe (for example), sporting a swastika, pontificating to the masses about its alternative meaning, and demanding that people respect it’s incredibly long, religious history. I would consider that to be ridiculous (especially because I do not subscribe to any of those religions), self-serving, antagonistic, and in general, extremely inconsiderate.

However, 88 is not a swastika, or the like - it’s a commonly used number (Across many, many cultures) - and in my opinion, Athletes who wear that number should not be considered to be referencing, or condoning racism, or inciting the type of hatred that comes with that particular territory.

Anyway, I will continue to judge each of these situations individually, based upon the positions, or values that I can discern from analyzing the information that is at hand.

Peace to the masses.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

juventus2

Senior Member
Jul 6, 2004
749
If 88 is a nazi number. Then 18 could be a Nazi number (AH), or 23 (2^3 is H), or 44 (4+4),...

People are too easily offended now. A number without context is just a number.
 
Jul 10, 2006
6,751
If 88 is a nazi number. Then 18 could be a Nazi number (AH), or 23 (2^3 is H), or 44 (4+4),...

People are too easily offended now. A number without context is just a number.
88 is used by neo-Nazi's. Not sure if they use any other numbers, though. There is a significance to it, but just because someone prefers 88 doesn't mean it's because they are saluting Adolf Hitler.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
111,724
Lots of BLACK NFL or college American football athletes wear the number 88. Typical number for a wide receiver.

But I suppose those guys are just a bunch of neo-nazis. :rolleyes2

Time to grow up for the usual suspects again.
 
Jul 10, 2006
6,751
Lots of BLACK NFL or college American football athletes wear the number 88. Typical number for a wide receiver.

But I suppose those guys are just a bunch of neo-nazis. :rolleyes2

Time to grow up for the usual suspects again.
The connection is likely lost on a lot of Americans, and Europeans too for that matter. And if told, most players who wear #88 would probably say "Who gives a shit?"
 
Jul 10, 2006
6,751
The #88 connection to Heil Hitler was not something the Nazis themselves came up with. It was created by wanna-be's long after the fiery death of the Third Reich.

A lot of Neo Nazis also fly American flags here in the US, but that doesn't make the American flag a Nazi symbol all of a sudden.
 
Mar 9, 2006
29,039
i just checked juvestore.com , official numbers - Cannavaro 5, Marchisio 8, so full squad is
GK:
Buffon 1, Chimenti 12, Manninger 13
Def:
Cannavaro 5, Chiellini 3, Legrottaglie 33, Grygera 21, Zebina 15, Molinaro 19, De Ceglie 29
Mid:
Sissoko 22, Camoranesi 16, Poulsen 18, Marchisio 8, Diego 28, Giovinco 20, Tiago 30, Zanetti 6, Salihamidzic 7, Melo 88(probably)
Att:
DP 10, Amauri 11, Iaquinta 9, Trezeguet 17

FORZA JUVE +)
 

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,882
^ Yeah, so far.
Tho I'm still hoping Diego picks another, much cooler/iconic numba. But here's to hoping that he will make 28 iconic :pint:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)