You are delusional and credulous.
why not hoori, what makes u shoot down the idea that this might've been an inside job.
do u think these attacks where orchestrated by guys who live in caves hoori? there a few good reasons to suggest other wise regarding the collapsing of the twin towers.
as burke mentioned the Us did'nt really need the 9/11 for there invasion of iraq, bec they did take there case to the united nations when it came to iraq ( even though they did'nt wait for the un's response to there case and went ahead with there attacks in march 2003). with afghanstan they went straight ahead a month after the attacks of 9/11.
i do believe 9/11 did the job of getting public support behind both wars and terrorism or global terrorism was used as an excuse to envade any country with out the need for un backing of such military efforts. kind of the same effect pearl harbour had ( with major differences between each incidents taken in consideration)
afghanistan-----> ( world public) reason used to justify attacks was getting osama bin laden and bring an end to taliban who sponser terror-----> (reasons after war kicked in)there is also the reason for gas lines that had to pass thru afghanistan for it to reach ports where it can be put on ships.
iraq----------> ( world public) reason used weapons of mass destruction, removing of saddam and bringing in democracy ot iraq----->(reasons that unfolded after the war kicked in) iraq being the second largest producer of oil in the world behind saudi arabia and ahead of iran.
there for i doubt the US public would back up the real reasons of both wars had it not been for 9/11 and the rising of a better reason ( at least its a reason that would make parents sending there sons/and daughters to war a bit easier and justified) instead of using lets go to iraq to be near oil fields, or lets go to afghanstan for gas lines.
i have a question that's been on my mind for a while now, if enough evidence/facts/historical backing is used does'nt that make things more on the lines of fact rather than being a conspiracy theory??