The NHL Thread (33 Viewers)
- Thread starter Bjerknes
- Start date
5 foot 9 185lbs
39g 43a 82pts
His size
39g 43a 82pts
His size
At this point though, he probably doesn't make a lot of sense in Montreal. Seriously though, it could be worse than Camalleri... if I was a Canadians fan, I'd certainly prefer him to Gionta.
I'm also not convinced about Havlat, simply because of his chronic injury issues. He's looking for long term... it's risky, which is why Chicago went in another direction.
Nice... Boston resigned Bitz. He's young, a brute force, pretty good hands... had a nice rookie debut. Don't know the terms, but this is a nice move provided it's reasonable.
30M over 5 years... wow. That seems very high. Camalleri is getting paid...
Yeah, TSN is destroying you guys (I haven't seen their reaction to Camalleri).
30M over 5 years... wow. That seems very high. Camalleri is getting paid...
Yeah, TSN is destroying you guys (I haven't seen their reaction to Camalleri).
Wow. Maybe it's a tad high (I obviously am biased, and underrated him a bit when I said 3.5... I thought someone would come back with 4), but considering what your team has already spent on some players... wow.
That would have been a manageable deal. He must not want to stay in Montreal... If Gainey offered Spacek 3.83M, and is overpaying everyone in sight, he must have made a similar offer to what Komisarek accepted.
At least Lucic will still get to pound him Komisarek into the ice on a regular basis.
That would have been a manageable deal. He must not want to stay in Montreal... If Gainey offered Spacek 3.83M, and is overpaying everyone in sight, he must have made a similar offer to what Komisarek accepted.
At least Lucic will still get to pound him Komisarek into the ice on a regular basis.
Guys, Cammalleri isn't a bad player, he's a very good sniper and doesn't get pushed around despite his small height. If you compare him to Havlat, he has more consistent numbers and at least you don't have to worry reoccurring injury problems.
I think the only reason you're not warm and fuzzy about him is because he's a Michigan grad.
Plus he has balls, as seen here.
I think the only reason you're not warm and fuzzy about him is because he's a Michigan grad.
Plus he has balls, as seen here.
Guys, Cammalleri isn't a bad player, he's a very good sniper and doesn't get pushed around despite his small height. If you compare him to Havlat, he has more consistent numbers and at least you don't have to worry reoccurring injury problems.
I think the only reason you're not warm and fuzzy about him is because he's a Michigan grad.
Plus he has balls, as seen here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g_r0xcKVIY
I think the only reason you're not warm and fuzzy about him is because he's a Michigan grad.
Plus he has balls, as seen here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g_r0xcKVIY
He's a good player and versatile. We'll play him on the left so he bring more than Tanguay. If we want to look at the bright side. Cammalleri is better than Tanguay and Gomez is better than Koivu atm.
I like him. He's Italien.
He's a good player and versatile. We'll play him on the left so he bring more than Tanguay. If we want to look at the bright side. Cammalleri is better than Tanguay and Gomez is better than Koivu atm.
He's a good player and versatile. We'll play him on the left so he bring more than Tanguay. If we want to look at the bright side. Cammalleri is better than Tanguay and Gomez is better than Koivu atm.