The Mod Thread ("because for some reason,you think we actually care") (14 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
71,341
That's it. You really are just a moron. The first bit talks about photographing, not publishing. So there you go. My God, can you even read, Burke? When exactly did you take this picture?

You're not my friend on facebook. And facebook is not a public domain. What is definitely NOT a public domain anyway is my circle of friends on facebook. Another thing: do you even know what public domain means?
chill man
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
Apr 12, 2004
77,143
That's it. You really are just a moron. The first bit talks about photographing, not publishing. So there you go. My God, can you even read, Burke? When exactly did you take this picture?

You're not my friend on facebook. And facebook is not a public domain. What is definitely NOT a public domain anyway is my circle of friends on facebook. Another thing: do you even know what public domain means?
The availability of anything to the public as a whole, I believe. And it was, until you removed me as a friend! :cry:

I took the picture...

Well hold on.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,537
No, the guy's a cunt. I give him all the information he needs, yet he's not even able to read the damn thing and then comes back here and starts talking down to me as if I don't know "the law", whatever he thinks that might be anyway. I'm okay with someone not knowing in the first place, but the hubris on display here is disgusting.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,537
ßüякε;2538721 said:
The availability of anything to the public as a whole, I believe. And it was, until you removed me as a friend! :cry:

I took the picture...

Well hold on.
First of all, it wasn't available to the public as a whole. It was available to a group of friends on facebook.

Second of all, public domain generally has to do with intellectual property rights. This isn't about intellectual property rights.

Third, it doesn't matter if you took the picture or not, it's my image. How can that possibly be so hard to understand?
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
71,341
No, the guy's a cunt. I give him all the information he needs, yet he's not even able to read the damn thing and then comes back here and starts talking down to me as if I don't know "the law", whatever he thinks that might be anyway. I'm okay with someone not knowing in the first place, but the hubris on display here is disgusting.

:D relax i ll try talking to him
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,143
First of all, it wasn't available to the public as a whole. It was available to a group of friends on facebook.

Second of all, public domain generally has to do with intellectual property rights. This isn't about intellectual property rights.

Third, it doesn't matter if you took the picture or not, it's my image. How can that possibly be so hard to understand?
It can't be your image because it's a picture of a picture, I took the picture.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,537
ßüякε;2538737 said:
No, I don't know.

Please tell, President of the World!

Ohh holy master of all that is known, the one who can do no wrong, I, your lowly subject, wish to be more knowledgeable.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/image

When I refer to my image, I'm not talking about the picture in particular, Burke. You're like a chimpanzee when it comes to these things.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,754
Not to take a side, but I think both arguments are wrong. Here's some help:

Seven it's your likeness. Now research cases of public domain law where a likeness is used.

Legally speaking. The picture of a picture thing doesn't matter because it is a picture of Seven, actually his likeness.

As we all know the likeness of someone can be legally and illegally obtained as well as used. Paparrazzi are sued all the time. Just because you take a picture doesn't make it yours and if you take a picture of a picture you still need the original photographers permission.

As for the issue of public domain. A photograph's availability does not simply make it public domain.

That's my info tip for the day.

However, I don't think it's going to matter. You must know Andries, that Burke is not going to take your photo down. Especially if you make a fuss over it. He likes that. If you leave it be, he's likely to change it once it gets old to him. Or once Bayern start playing again.:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 13)